Ixthis888
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Church of Greece structure, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Church_of_Greece_Structure. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyright problems
edit
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Church of Greece structure, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.orthodoxwiki.org/Church_of_Greece_Structure. As a copyright violation, Church of Greece structure appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Church of Greece structure has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Church of Greece structure and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Church of Greece structure with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Church of Greece structure.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 00:50, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, I am the original "author" or "Creator" of the article on OrthodoxWiki! Do I have the right to put a page up on Wikipedia if I created it on OW in the first place? Is the owner the person who put the article up or OW? - (talk) 02:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Please see this. It states that it does not want aticles on orthodoxwiki articles imported onto wikipedia. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 02:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, it says:
Exporting OrthodoxWiki material When exporting material from OrthodoxWiki, the dual licensing means that you can choose which license to export content under—it is "either/or" not "both." It is important to note that this only applies to material submitted directly to OrthodoxWiki. Articles that began as Wikipedia imports may only be exported under the GFDL (while the added parts alone may be either CC by-sa or GFDL). The licenses are pretty similar, with some minor differences. All that is required to use OrthodoxWiki material is to cite your source and include a link back to the original article (preferably its versioned URL, which can be found by clicking the most recent date on the history page). This does not apply to material explicitly licensed in some other way, which should be noted on the article or other material (many photographs, for instance, are licensed only to OrthodoxWiki and may not be exported).
Note to Wikipedia editors: Most OrthodoxWiki content may, unless otherwise noted, be freely used under the GFDL. This means we only ask for a link back to the original article (preferably its versioned URL, which can be found by clicking on the most recent date on the history page), with proper credit given. You do not need to include the list of authors, since they will be listed in our local article history.
- I understand that to mean that I can ...especially if I AM the person who put the article together in the first place! Am I not understanding something?
Re:Parsons functions
editWhat are you talking about with your comment. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 02:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah I get what you mean now. I do not know why that is, but I bet if you bring it up on a page where you could ask questions for that wiki, you could get it answered. An example of that sort of page is the Village pump on Wikipedia. --Ŵïllî§ï$2 (Talk!/Cont.) 03:07, 11 July 2008 (UTC)