Izumi2009
Welcome!
edit
|
Mike Tsang moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, Mike Tsang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 13:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review and notice. May I know which part of the article is not verifiable? This is an English translation of the Chinese wikipedia page. I have added in English sources where available and re-used the original Chinese article information and sources for the rest. Izumi2009 (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- In addition, the section Controversy was newly added and is not part of the original Chinese page because I felt there was a need to explain the situation to non-Chinese readers, who may not have been familiar with critical parts affecting this artist's career. I have no conflict of interest here, merely a wish to present a more comprehensive view, and I have supported each statement in that section with sources. However if this is the section with problems, please let me know and I can remove it.Izumi2009 (talk) 23:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry for the many questions. I've gone through Wikipedia:Reliable_sources and could not find an answer:
- 1) As this is a translation of a Chinese Wikipedia page, the tables and lists are directly translated from the said page and I have added a source to any additional information (e.g. additional charts). Do I need to verify the Chinese Wikipedia information as well, as it has already been published and reviewed by the editors there?
- 2) I understand that wikilinks within English Wikipedia are not to be taken as credible sources. However, Chinese Wikipedia has comprehensive pages on, say, each weekly broadcaster music chart, where they have quoted their own sources. Are the relevant Chinese Wikipedia pages acceptable sources?Izumi2009 (talk) 23:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review of my article Mike Tsang yesterday. Further to my question yesterday, I have added in new sources to verify all my statements where possible, including the tables and lists which were directly translated from the original Chinese Wikipedia page. Statements and listed data which could not be verified have been taken out. There are now over 100 source references, of which the vast majority are in Chinese (as the subject person is a local Hong Kong singer). I would be most grateful if you could let me know where else I might have missed, so that I'm not looking at the wrong place. Thanks again! Izumi2009 (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Tsang has been accepted
editCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
– 333-blue at 00:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC)- Thank you! Izumi2009 (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)