J. Berndorff
Welcome!
edit
Hello, J. Berndorff, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 17:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hello! J. Berndorff,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 17:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Please mind the namespaces
editYou can find your pages at User:J.Berndorff/sandbox3 and User:J.Berndorff/sandbox3 AGAIN. Please take care not to create your sandbox pages in the main namespace. Fram (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry for the mistake and thanks for correcting this J. Berndorff (talk) 06:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
edit
Hello, J. Berndorff. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:36, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Jimfbleak, my understanding of the Wikipedia rules is that while it is not ideal to create or modify entries on behalf of individuals/institutions/companies, it is permitted if you disclose this commission and it serves the purpose of Wikipedia to inform the public about relevant matters. Provided, of course, that one adheres to the Wikipedia rules regarding relevance, transparency and a factual, encyclopedic writing style.
- Or does an institution or a scientist with social relevance have to wait until a completely independent Wikipedian gets the idea to create an entry? In many cases, it is rather employees or other persons associated with the institution who create an entry or correct existing entries if they contain errors. Because they have the necessary knowledge about the institution.
- In my case, some institutions have decided to commission an independent science journalist to create an entry according to Wikipedia rules or to add relevant information to existing entries or to bring them up to date. To me, this seemed legitimate. I went through a mentoring program at the German Wikipedia and made my entries to the best of my knowledge and belief, striving above all to avoid promotion. If individual formulations nevertheless appear too promotional, they must of course be corrected or deleted. But the researchers or institutes described remain relevant.
- Do I see this wrong? J. Berndorff (talk) 08:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
Reply
editIf you leave me a message on this page, I will know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~~~~ when you post it. That will send me an alert.
There is a formal way to declare your COI. You must post it on your user page User:J. Berndorff with the format {{paid|client= |employer=}} with separate templates for each employer/client.
Please read the guidance below:
- When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
- Your text, other than his papers, was largely unsourced.
- By definition, his own papers are not independent third-party sources and don't contribute to his notability since they are part of an academic's job. They are not suitable as references. Journal articles should be in a separate Publications section with no further reference. We need to know what independent sources say.
- Some of your refs are incomplete. For example, the Nature paper doesn't include the journal name or the authors. References that are not in English should include the language= parameter
- You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
- In just the first paragraph we get ) is an accomplished Austrian biochemist renowned for his extensive contributions... a world-class research program... positioning the institute as a leading center in the field. Lots of weasel words throughout
- There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
- You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
If you write about an organisation, the notability guidelines for organisations and companies involve primary criteria with five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
- significant coverage in
- independent,
- multiple,
- reliable,
- secondary sources.
- Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ok User:Jimfbleak, thanks for this very detailed explanation. I will try my best to abide better by these rules. I also read now that in COI cases like this it is recommended to prepare the article in the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process. Will do this next time. J. Berndorff (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
- User:Jimfbleak, is there a way to get the last version of the deleted entry so that I can make the desired improvements to it? This would allow me to keep all the corrections that were made to the entry after it was published. Thanks! J. Berndorff (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Swiss Nanoscience Institute SNI.png
edit
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Swiss Nanoscience Institute SNI.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Martino Poggio has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)