User talk:JPG-GR/Archive 14

Concern with Infobox hotel merger

I have a concern that your closure at this discussion did not mention the fact that it will make Infobox building harder to use. And especially since you closed the TFD at Infobox casino "No consensus", this makes me wonder if Infobox hotel should've been closed off as no consensus too. Cutecutecuteface2000 (Questions, comments, complaints?) 13:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

That's because it shouldn't make Template:Infobox hotel any harder to use. Vegaswikian commented that only two parameters would need to be added to Template:Infobox building. The opposers did not make a case against the merge, and your objection is nearly 8 months after the fact. JPG-GR (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear JPG-GR,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I am likely not active enough anymore to be enough of an interviewee for your project. However, I will take the request under consideration - feel free to check back if you have slots that need to be filled after an appropriate amount of time.

Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator Sumanah (talk) 14:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Is it appropriate to recreate Template:Cr-IPL/Flags?

The template {{Cr-IPL/Flags}} has been deleted aa result of a deletion discussion this TFD discussion. There is a discussion going on at Talk:2012 Indian Premier League for a proposal to add the flags and this template may have to be recreated or restored. If it is appropriate, please let me know so that I can recreate it, or just undelete it (It is not an attack page nor a copyright violation) if not I may start a deletion review on the template. jfd34 (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Based on the discussion, the concern seems to be whether these are legit flags or just decorative uses of team colors on Wikipedia. If you can show that the flags depicted are used by the teams, there should be no issue re-adding them. If, however, they are in fact created only for use on Wikipedia, they should stay gone. JPG-GR (talk) 18:14, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Indian jurisdiction

About a year ago you closed this discussion as "delete after necessary conversions/substitutions/what-have-you." During the discussion I raised issues (without making a !vote) about the practicality of doing the conversion, and indeed, almost a year later, nothing was done and the template is still very widely used (17986 transclusions). Do you think the template should stay in the current limbo state? Should the delete decision be revisited in light of this? Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 06:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

There is no deadline for the conversion of the template. Eventually someone will make the "necessary conversions/substitutions/what-have-you", or they won't. JPG-GR (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Merging

No one's answering me on WT:TOKU and you're frankly the only person I can trust on these matters. Seeing as the main villain list and the MMPR villain pages were deleted, undeleted, and then restored at AFD, DRV, and AFD again, I think it's about time that we end this practice of having multiple pages per series and simply have a singular list of characters.

This is obviously going to be difficult for the Zordon era because casts were retaind across multiple seasons, but I think we need to start with what I've coordinated at List of Power Rangers Lost Galaxy characters. AlienX2009 started it out but he is for some reason refusing to continue. With Leo Corbett (that guy really needs the boot but now that I've said it to you it can't be done by you) creating separate pages for all of the Megaforce characters (which I've reverted because we don't know shit after 2 episodes), I think we need to enforce this change.

I'm also thinking the Zords per season pages also need to go, but the only solution I can think of is just merging everything with Zord. It's obvious we're not going to find reliable sources to show the notability for anything beyond Turbo at best, so I think merging is going to be the better option than being blindsided by AFDs that we aren't made aware of until someone removes all the redlinks.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hollywood stock exchange

Hi,
I recommend that you read the verifiability policy. It says:

Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be replaced without an inline citation to a reliable source.

There are other policies which apply to the text that you're adding, but WP:V is a good place to start. bobrayner (talk) 21:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm not adding any text, I'm undo-ing what you have been removing. What you say above is all fine and well, but begs the question - why are you removing only part of the article which is not sourced? JPG-GR (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Dino Charge

You should have really protected the redirect you made because we're dealing with a sock farm who thinks he's allowed to make the page. Also, the Power Rangers:Dino Charge one needs to be nuked and protected.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

When I am in an editor role (which is more common these days than an admin role), I see no reason to exercise admin actions. Moreoever, I believe that creating an article (even if it is only a redirect) only to immediately protect it is bad form. JPG-GR (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

You hadn't been party to the mess that the sockpuppets have been laying out. He moved every page he could when I posted the requested move and edited all of the redirects. He then keeps making his shit version of the Dino Charge page which wouldn't even last in the first place because it has all of one reference on it. And he keeps dicking around with page moves and redirects, on top of trying to get me blocked for finding his latest account.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 17:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for stepping in as the voice of reason in the colon debate. I had very little idea that this was the 5th time Ryulong tried adding the colons to the Power Rangers titles. I know now his section break addings were not only bullshit, but was only put there as schmuck bait of sorts as to discredit me. Wouldn't you agree that an unnecessary section break is not a "legitimate talk page comment" as described in the warning templates he quickly posted on my page? It is not part of the actual argument, it just disrupts it so his contradictions are harder to quote! Notice how the insistence of the section break uses flawed reasoning just as his insistence on the colons was. He arbitrarily chose what sources were legitimate or not. Like his 3rd party sources (which got more and more obscure) were more legitimate than mine he forced me to get. Even a quote where his own argument is acknowledged he discards because it was too close to the primary source. My block was BS and the appeals process was just a sham. The fact that he got a slap on the wrist is all the more insulting--Harmony944 (talk) 20:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

"No problem" to joining the discussion. "No comment" to the rest. JPG-GR (talk) 22:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Harmony944 needs to read WP:Arbitrary section break and let it go.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 09:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Surely monitoring my talkpage must get boring these days? JPG-GR (talk) 00:14, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I came back to see if you had responded to my previous message and found his comments.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Plausible. My apologies. JPG-GR (talk) 22:00, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Question about date of KFAR frequency change

I posted this on the Talk page for KFAR, but then I realized you might see it here sooner. Where did you find the information that KFAR "moved to 660 kHz in 1956"? An article in the Oct. 11, 1948, issue of Broadcasting shows KFAR at 660 then. See "KFAR, KENI Join MBS" on page 81 here. Therefore, the shift must have occurred prior to Oct. 11, 1948.Eddie Blick (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

The only edits I ever made to that article were maintenance-related and have nothing to do with what you speak of. JPG-GR (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Can you please delete this KIS template I forgot after the merge?

I previously merged individual state KIS templates, some of which were created by you, and took them to MfD, where they were deleted without opposition. (such as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:KIS/AK) I somehow forgot to include WP:KIS/MI among those. Since you were the original creator, I was wondering if you could delete it. The only other edits were maintenance following the TfD. It is orphaned. Would this qualify as G6 or another CSD? Thank you. —PC-XT+ 13:46, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. JPG-GR (talk) 03:56, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks —PC-XT+ 14:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

WGHN-FM talk page

Were you the deleting administrator for the WGHN-FM talk page? I have split WGHN into WGHN (AM) & WGHN-FM as the stations haven't simulcast in years. I need the talk page undeleted.Stereorock (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Nope, but there's also no edit history to speak of, so feel free to recreate it.

Technical tap listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Technical tap. Since you had some involvement with the Technical tap redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:English language

Hello, I wish to know if it's okay to re-create the English language template and make it similar looking to the Korean and Japanese templates? Thanks. Seqqis (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

To undelete: Gerald Walpin

The recent U.S. news media about death of former US inspector general Gerald Walpin of AmeriCorps has raised questions about wp:GNG notability. So do you think could undelete "Gerald Walpin" as now considered long-term notable (since 2009) by several news sources, or should we next wp:DR [DRV] that page? thanks. -Wikid77 (talk) 05:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

• I assume you meant WP:DELREV, which is probably your best choice. JPG-GR (talk) 01:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes, "wp:DRV" but too busy on typos, but thanks, so now added into:
"WP:Deletion review/Log/2016 June 29". Onward and upward. -Wikid77 (talk) 15:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

IP user

An IP user brought back its edits on The Transformers (TV series), List of programs broadcast by Fox Kids, and Beast Machines: Transformers. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

• More info: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/The_UPN_Vandal/Archive | Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/The_UPN_Vandal JPG-GR (talk) 03:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Wake County templates

Wow.. I didn't realize the talk page thing was going on. What was I thinking? Thanks for fixing it. As for the templates displaying twice I'll take a look and remove instances where it does so. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Template talk:Rfc top

Hi, re this close - please can you convince Legoktm (talk · contribs) to fix the bot? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Per WP:BOTR, "If a bot is acting improperly, a note about that should be posted to the owner's talk page and to the Administrators' Noticeboard. A link to such a posting may be posted at the Bot Owners' Noticeboard." JPG-GR (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes

Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13

Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news

• A recent RfC has redefined how articles on schools are evaluated at AfD. Specifically, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.
• AfDs that receive little participation should now be closed like an expired proposed deletion, following a deletion process RfC.
• Defender, HakanIST, Matiia and Sjoerddebruin are our newest stewards, following the 2017 steward elections.
• The 2017 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Góngora, Krd, Lankiveil, Richwales and Vogone. They will serve for approximately 1 year.

Technical news

• A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
• Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
• A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2017).

Administrator changes

TheDJ

Xnuala • CJ • Oldelpaso • Berean Hunter • Jimbo Wales • Andrew c • Karanacs • Modemac • Scott

Guideline and policy news

• Following a discussion on the backlog of unpatrolled files, consensus was found to create a new user right for autopatrolling file uploads. Implementation progress can be tracked on Phabricator.
• The BLPPROD grandfather clause, which stated that unreferenced biographies of living persons were only eligible for proposed deletion if they were created after March 18, 2010, has been removed following an RfC.
• An RfC has closed with consensus to allow proposed deletion of files. The implementation process is ongoing.
• After an unsuccessful proposal to automatically grant IP block exemption, consensus was found to relax the criteria for granting the user right from needing it to wanting it.

Technical news

• After a recent RfC, moved pages will soon be featured in a queue similar to Special:NewPagesFeed and require patrolling. Moves by administrators, page movers, and autopatrolled editors will be automatically marked as patrolled.
• Cookie blocks have been deployed. This extends the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user if they switch accounts, even under a new IP.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2017).

Administrator changes

Karanacs • Berean Hunter • GoldenRing • Dlohcierekim

Gdr • Tyrenius • JYolkowski • Longhair • Master Thief Garrett • Aaron Brenneman • Laser brain • JzG • Dragons flight

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC has clarified that user categories should be emptied upon deletion, but redlinked user categories should not be removed if re-added by the user.
• Discussions are ongoing regarding proposed changes to the COI policy. Changes so far have included clarification that adding a link on a Wikipedia forum to a job posting is not a violation of the harassment policy.

Technical news

• You can now see a list of all autoblocks at Special:AutoblockList.
• There is a new tool for adding archives to dead links. Administrators are able to restrict other user's ability to use the tool, and have additional permissions when changing URL and domain data.
• Administrators, bureaucrats and stewards can now set an expiry date when granting user rights. (discuss, permalink)

Miscellaneous

• Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

JavaScript RegExp problem

I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript#Nested RegExp.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes

Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn

ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC proposing an off-wiki LTA database has been closed. The proposal was broadly supported, with further discussion required regarding what to do with the existing LTA database and defining access requirements. Such a tool/database formed part of the Community health initiative's successful grant proposal.
• Some clarifications have been made to the community banning and unblocking policies that effectively sync them with current practice. Specifically, the community has reached a consensus that when blocking a user at WP:AN or WP:ANI, it is considered a "community sanction", and administrators cannot unblock unilaterally if the user has not successfully appealed the sanction to the community.
• An RfC regarding the bot policy has closed with changes to the section describing restrictions on cosmetic changes.

Technical news

• Users will soon be able to blacklist specific users from sending them notifications.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2017 elections, the new members of the Board of Trustees include Raystorm, Pundit and Doc James. They will serve three-year terms.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes

Happyme22 • Dragons flight

Zad68

Guideline and policy news

• The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.

Technical news

• Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding ?fuzzy=1 to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.
• A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.

Miscellaneous

• A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
• A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
• Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).

Administrator changes

Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 ^{(first RfA to reach WP:300)}

Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news

• Following a series of discussions around new pages patrol, the WMF is helping implement a controlled autoconfirmed article creation trial as a research experiment, similar to the one proposed in 2011. You can learn more about the research plan at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial. The exact start date of the experiment has yet to be determined.
• A new speedy deletion criterion, regarding articles created as a result undisclosed paid editing, is currently being discussed (permalink).
• An RfC (permalink) is currently open that proposes expanding WP:G13 to include all drafts, even if they weren't submitted through Articles for Creation.

Technical news

• LoginNotify should soon be deployed to the English Wikipedia. This will notify users when there are suspicious login attempts on their account.
• The new version of XTools is nearing an official release. This suite of tools includes administrator statistics, an improved edit counter, among other tools that may benefit administrators. You can report issues on Phabricator and provide general feedback at mw:Talk:XTools.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

Nakon • Scott

Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

• ACTRIAL, a research experiment that restricts article creation to autoconfirmed users, will begin on September 7. It will run for six months. You can learn more about the research specifics at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, while Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial is probably the best venue for general discussion.
• Following an RfC, WP:G13 speedy deletion criterion now applies to any page in the draftspace that has not been edited in six months. There is a bot-generated report, updated daily, to help identify potentially qualifying drafts that have not been submitted through articles for creation.

Technical news

• You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
• Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
• In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

• Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem

Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

• Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
• Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news

• You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration

• Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
• A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing JPG-GR/Archive 14 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Slightlymad 04:02, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93

Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

• The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
• A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.

Arbitration

• Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
• Following a request for comment, Ritchie333, Yunshui and Ymblanter will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.

Obituaries

• The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

Joe Roe

JzG

Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

• Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
• A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration

• Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous

• Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
• The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JPG-GR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)