JPGR69

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Agent Orange (band), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Agent Orange (band) was changed by JPGR69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-07-23T09:22:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Current/Past Members of the Beatles

There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 00:30, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mick Jagger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dave Stewart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

McCartney discography

Nice work! That was a big improvement. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 08:53, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Carlos Santana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Tom Waits discography

For what possible reason would you add album links to the main article when there is a separate discography? And why, if you felt it was necessary, would you do so without an edit summary explaining your reasons? I really do not regard that as helpful. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 14:45, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

• Is there some sort of central consensus that this is a good thing? Because I don't see the point of it. For example, who gets to say which albums get included? --John (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rick Wakeman discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Les Reed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Discography

I see you have been adding the main albums to many bios - I agree that many bios have them.... BUT bios like Frank Zappa and Neil Young are highly developed and will mention the albums in the main text (with links) - plus they can also been seen at the bottom of the page in the templates. So in cases were albums are arleady linked 2 times in an article we generally avoid adding them again in the "Discography" section thus liking them 3 times especially when a Discography has its own page. You will find well developed articles (like FA and GA) article generally have this format. That said just need to talk about the changes at the very least in your edit summary if not on the talk pages following the good practice of Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and Wikipedia:Edit summary.... Moxy (talk) 16:49, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Removing live BB King album

Greetings JPGR69. I don't see the point of removing BB King's "Apollo" recording. As there doesn't appear to be any consensus to that effect on the corresponding talkpage, if there is any elsewhere, I'd appreciate it if you could point me to it. The recording in question won a Grammy so it's not just "any old recording". On the other hand, personally, I think that as there's already a link to the complete discography, the whole section would be better if it only listed his Grammy-winning recordings. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 08:02, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Technopat. I agree that Apollo is a very important album in BB's career, but the thing is - that is not the point. Wiki discographies should not depend on subjective criteria like fame or critical acclaim. This album list has to be coherent with the more detailed list appearing on the discography page. Anyway, I agree that "solo albums" is a bit confusing, so I renamed this list as "studio albums", which means you can create a "live albums" section just below, where Apollo would rightly belong. Regards, --JPGR69

Gallagher Discography

Greetings. I noticed that you and another user have been making the same change to the Rory Gallagher discography section. I think the order was you removed a live album, another user put it back and now you have re-removed it. I put a section on the Rory Gallagher talk page to discuss it. I don't feel strongly about the issue but I don't see the rationale for just removing an album because its a live album. I'm not aware of any policy that live albums can't go on those summary pages and for some artists (and Rory is such an artist IMO) their live act and live albums really defined who they were and belong in a summary. Mdebellis (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Single purpose account?

Couldn't help but notice you've been a virtual WP:SPA for years rming all links to "non-studio" albums from artists' discographies; is there a WP page you can point to justifying the removal of these links? Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

The general consensus is that these "short discographies" only list "regular albums" (mostly studio albums, no compilations, no live albums apart from those consisting of previously unreleased material). Other albums are usually listed on the detailed discography page. That's the way it works on most artists wiki pages ; all I do is correct a few pages every once in a while so as to match this objective criteria.

OK, JPGR69, do I correctly understand that this is a "general consensus" you are enforcing to orphan certain album articles and delink them from their artist articles, only this "general consensus" doesn't seem to be actually written down anywhere that you can point to? Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 14:41, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

The album articles are not really orphaned, they are still linked in the discography pages. The consensus is not written anywhere, but does it mean it is a bad thing ?

It stretches the meaning of the word "consensus" when you have an unwritten, undiscussed "consensus" in your head that you are enforcing across the board. It's much preferable to have a discussion in the appropriate place (probably the relevant wikiproject) to sound out things like "consensus". That would at least give you something you could point to if anyone challenges it. I see quite a few other editors above here have questioned why you were removing links from individual articles over the years, but there's really no other way to settle consensus. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 15:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Agree on the "consensus" thing. I always explained why I removed some links, and sometimes agreed on keeping them on the list after discussion with other editors. I do not mean to enforce anything. For example, concerning "Babylon By Bus" by Bob Marley, my opinion is that there is no objective reason why it should be on the list and not, say, the 1975 "Live!" album ; but I am ready to discuss the subject.

Grateful Dead -- Discography section

Greetings, JPGR69. I have started a discussion related to a change you made two years ago in the Discography section of the Grateful Dead article. There's been some recent back and forth about what that section should include. Feel free to join in, at Talk:Grateful Dead#Discography. Thanks. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 13:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Discographies

Whilst I appreciate your efforts in expanding the discographies for various blues musicians, please bear in mind a couple of key editing guidelines. Firstly, additional information edited into Wikipedia should have associated reliable source(s). Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability in this regard. Also, it is never a good idea to remove existing references, as you did recently at Eddie Cusic, without good reason and an alternative source. Thank you,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alan Price may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *''Covers'' with The Electric Blues Company ((AP Records) 1994

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:55, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JPGR69. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Manifest Density

Hello, JPGR69,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Manifest Density should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifest Density .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Okamialvis (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JPGR69. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Focus discography

Editors at Wikipedia removes «Ship of Memories» from the discography over and over again. Why? Ship of Memories, Golden Oldies & Focus Family Album is a compilation STUDIO album. Compilation albums is "greatest hits", like "Hocus Pocus" (1994) & "Best of Vol. 2" (2011). No greatest hits compilations, but compilation studio albums is OK. Do not remove "Ship of Memories from the discography section on this page page. Thank you. --NRKfan (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, JPGR69. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pere Ubu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Jane Morris. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)