JSpanbur, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi JSpanbur! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC) |
Edits to Music Man
editStrengths: Informative without taking sides. When there are split perspectives on an issue, the article provides multiple voices that capture the different perspectives. Structure is clear. Weakness: Information regarding the various guitar models seems to be sparse/nonexistent. Many examples of missing citations. The “early years” section seems to go on very long to end at an anticlimactic end. When was the article started? How did the article look in its early stages? How long did it take to get to its current stage? The article was developed in November 2004, and started off as a single line about who uses the instruments. It is still a work in progress, and has been constantly updated from 2004 all the way to the present day. How/When was material added? By whom? How long did it take to get to its current stage? How recently have edits been made? Is it still active? Material has been added sporadically throughout recent years, with a possibility of the editors mirroring new releases by the company. As of the last year, the most prolific editor would be Allisonhargis. The most recent edit was from February 2017, and still seems to be active.
How actively did the editors use it? For what reason? How would you describe the tone of the conversation? Do you see the same editors here that you saw on the history page? The talk page is not used at all. There is one post from 2010 about copyright violations on serious lengths of the article. The editors who commented on the talk page are not the main ones that are still updating the page.
In edits that were made to the page, I fixed some minor grammar in the "early years" section of the article. All of the fixed errors were punctuation based.