User talk:J Greb/Archive Dec 2012

Latest comment: 11 years ago by J Greb in topic Small question...


Orphaned non-free media (File:Barryallen-kitson.JPG)

  Thanks for uploading File:Barryallen-kitson.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

The notoriuos wiki troll ( Iaaasi) returned

Hello!

The well known chauvinist romanian wiki-troll User:Iaaasi returned (with a new croatian fake identity) He is now active alias user: Irji2012 He is often active in Hungarian-related aricles, he enjoy edit-warring deleting good sources and sentences from important articles, and he like to break the rules of wiki even 3 revert rule. Can you arrange about this notorious wiki-troll? Thank you! Peter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.49.97 (talk) 10:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:DCdatabase

 Template:DCdatabase has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)TCM 05:48, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Punisher

Antoinejd (contribs) has been edit-warring consistently over the Punisher article against multiple different editors for a few months now. He did add a note to the article talk page a while ago, but there was no discussion. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Mastermind

Han2007 undid your edit on this article, so I reverted it back. They then left an unfriendly message on my talk page and undid it again. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Someone is not good at listening. :( 129.33.19.254 (talk) 23:23, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

About Me

I did not mean to offend you. Also there are people who have given me bad references from you and I have heard good things about you. On the other hand I know Matermind is the X-men movies and if you want to look for evidence but that will be later though as the anonymous user I do not like busybodies. As for the deleted scenes of Tim Burton's Batman look for it in YouTube and you will se I don't not lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Han2007 (talkcontribs) 23:48, December 17, 2012‎ (UTC)

About Mastermind though I doubt you're a fan of Marvel Comics I gave you references and sources but quite another thing is that you do not bother to read them. Also I ask you to please reconsider the deleted scenes of Batman (1989), if you see the source that I gave at YouTube really tell you the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Han2007 (talkcontribs) 16:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

  1. Please don't assume.
  2. With Mastermind, you are relying on your own opinion of what is in the film. That is original research.
  3. YouTube, especially with pirated content, is not a reliable source.
- J Greb (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Batman

IP "72.213.151.42" changed the name of the section without any justification.

He did not use the "talk page". The section name was "Christopher Nolan series" not "The Dark Knight Trilogy" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.251.177.99 (talk) 19:14, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


What can I say? Our old buddy BOZ had a great idea! --Tenebrae (talk) 16:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Doctor Who and Shada.jpg)

  Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who and Shada.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

You have mail!

 
Hello, J Greb. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

From about a month ago regarding a nomination for a free t-shirt :) Let me know if you need another one. Jalexander--WMF 21:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Small question...

Is there any procedure when an editor slaps {{retired}} on their user page but continues to actively edit? And in doing so does not use edit summaries or talk pages?

I'm looking at Batman194 (talk · contribs) who "retired" Feb 11, 2012 [1] but has been editing daily almost none stop since. They have almost 0 edits outside of article space [2][3] and next to no edit summaries.

- J Greb (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

In my experience, I tend to ignore such templates. The real info is in the contribution history anyway.
And while it would be nice if editors use edit summaries, afaik, there's no requirement for that.
Though misleading summaries are obviously frowned on as abusing good faith.
I'm guessing this isn't what you wanted to hear, sorry for that. Regardless, I hope it helps. - jc37 03:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
It does. Thanks. - J Greb (talk) 04:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)