Jackandvictor

August 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sharleen Spiteri, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sharleen Spiteri was changed by Jackandvictor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852894 on 2011-08-28T13:16:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:16, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Your edits to Doncaster

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Doncaster. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 13:29, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doncaster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jeremy (talk) 18:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Doncaster

Not here to revert your additions to Doncaster. Don't re-add it or you'll likely end up blocked or banned.Mddkpp (talk) 01:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

You'll find that this is an encyclopedia, and historical evidence exists that proves that Doncaster has never become English again, therefore it is officially Scottish. That is fact, that is the truth, and that is what encylopedia's are there for.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, and must be presented in appropriate context as what appears to be a historical curiosity, rather than "Doncaster is part of Scotland." Use the article talkpages: that's what they're there for. Acroterion (talk) 14:55, 1 March 2012 (UTC)