User talk:Jacklemann
Add topicMay 2026
[edit]
Hello, I'm SunDawn, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Denaturation (biochemistry), it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 14:44, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Dear SunDawn while I do agree with the removal of my contribution in "Freedom of thought" I do not with your allegation regarding the denaturation article.
- Please revert. Thx or I'll check wikipedia policy against ur actions against some European med student like me who has joined wikipedia in 2014. Jacklemann (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Freedom of thought, you may be blocked from editing. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 14:45, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- I have checked the no original research policy, which states that the source must have been published and still exist—somewhere in the world, in any language, whether or not it is reachable online. For my contribution to the freedom of thought article, there have been plenty of academic legal discussions, which you as "Programmer" from Indonesia living in the USA probably don't know off.
- In the spirit of peace, I'd suggest you quickly delete your threats off my page, while I promise I'll be more careful with my future edits. Jacklemann (talk) 15:10, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- I have reviewed both of my warnings and I stand by by my warnings. Both warnings are correct and valid. On both articles you didn't cite any resources at all, and per Wikipedia policies both can be removed. Both seems to be your knowledge and thinking, and per WP:OR it can be removed. If you wanted to restore both, you must provide references that supported your statements. I am going to ignore your threats. On the other hand, there is no restriction to remove my warning by yourself on your own talk page, but the warning remains to be on the log and other editors could easily see it. Have a pleasant weekend. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 16:21, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Wracking. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Wasian, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Wracking talk! 20:01, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Wracking.
- You have reverted my additions of names to a list of notable people that are concerned by that article.
- The biography section of the Wikipedia pages of the people I have added to the list, directly supports the information presented in the article (them being notable people of that descent).
- Please let me know if u can give a "go-sign" on my changes now that u have this information. Else I'll have to copy all the sources.
- Thanks Kr, Jacklemann Jacklemann (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not a reliable source and a wikilink is not sufficient sourcing; moreover, that article is about the term Wasian, so sources should directly identify individuals with that term. Please also see my note at Talk:Wasian. Wracking talk! 20:14, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Verifiability and original research
[edit]Hi Jacklemann, as you have been advised above: Please review the Wikipedia policies Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Best, Wracking talk! 22:28, 23 May 2026 (UTC)