May 2012

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Medical cannabis. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The source you removed was tagged as unreliable but correctly supported the sentence before. Alfie↑↓© 14:04, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talk pages

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Cancer, you may be blocked from editing. Your ongoing efforts to push cannabis-related content on cancer are against consensus. Your most recent posting has been removed. JFW | T@lk 20:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Cancer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Content discussions are not resolved by simply refusing to accept the input of other editors or repeating the same thing over and over and over.Novangelis (talk) 14:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am reporting both of you for admin abuse. Admins who suppress editing discussions should not be admins. I am simply discussing the addition of new information and your threats as a tool to support your opinions in an editing discussion is highly inappropriate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackpots777 (talkcontribs) 16:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

  1. I am not an admin.
  2. Read WP:BOOMERANG before you act.
  3. The appropriate board for your inappropriate complaint is WP:DRN.Novangelis (talk) 16:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Your lack of authority makes your comment all the more inappropriate. All of the comments I have made are based upon verifiable information that fulfills Wikipedia's policies and any repetition exists only to show the errors other editors have made when stating otherwise.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackpots777 (talkcontribs) 16:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
(edit conflict × 2):Go ahead. BTW, you are mixing something up. Users JFWcheck and Doc Jamescheckare admins. Users WhatamIdoingcheck, Novangelischeck, and myselfcheck are not. For sure all of us have a hidden agenda. ;-) Would you mind signing your posts in the future? Alfie↑↓© 17:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

CANNABIS OIL

edit

i am not familiar with wiki in how to really use it so i hope i am commenting in the right place.

i was trying to make an addition to the CANCER wiki page under 'alternative therapies' in order to add cannabis oil and also antineoplaston therapy. both medicines cure cancers, verifiably. proven over and over again so i won't go into it here.

anyway, i stumbled into the collapsed box on an obvious hot mess of an argument.

i would like to put my 2c in here: jackpots777 who is trying to get the admins (not sure why a cancer page needs admins or semi/protected use. doesn't seem right or fair. plainly it is wrong. i thought wikipedia was a reliable source, but now i realize it is not. it is just a joke of sorts.

any alternative therapies, treatments, etc., should be editable on the main page. it is an act of treason to not allow such a thing. wikipedia is not an advertisement for the cancer industry. it IS an industry.

it should be open to fairness in the name of all humanity.

i was disgusted by the lack of professionalism in the talk section. someone, jackpots777, trying to get ALL the information out not just what the admins of the cancer page want to be published. really disgusting stuff, folks.

cannabis oil and antineoplaston therapy (dr. burzynski) MUST be put on the cancer page. it should be against the law NOT to have them in plain sight on the main page for someone that might be using this 'encyclopedia' to gain information about a diagnosis they may have just received.

I, for one, will not be using wikipedia for any research or knowledge seeking on any level. I find this whole episode appalling.

peace

k — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalijuri (talkcontribs) 16:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply