JacobJosephFrank
Welcome!
editWelcome to Wikipedia, JacobJosephFrank! I am La comadreja and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!
La comadreja formerly AFriedman RESEARCH (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia
editMmm - Milk! | ||
A tall, cool glass of milk just for you! Milk somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a glass of milk, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! |
Hi Jacob! Welcome to Wikipedia. Here is a plate of cookies with lard in them, and a glass of milk. Thank you for assisting on the article about Jacob Frank. You know that he is an official mascot of our sister project, Wikiversity? Anyway, I hope you decide to remain with us. Let me know if you have any questions. --La comadreja purification through transgression RESEARCH (talk) 23:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
First account?
editHey there. Is this your first account or have you ever edited under another name or as an unregistered user? Thanks, NickCT (talk) 18:50, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Geller
editHi, I reverted your revert, it is clearly disputed and a bit contentious, please follow WP:BRD and seek consensus on the talkpage, thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Geller
editYou currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pamela Geller. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Off2riorob (talk) 17:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- - Please self revert or I will be forced to report you to the edit warring noticeboard and request your editing privileges are restricted. Off2riorob (talk) 17:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)Geller
editStraight back off a block and you start immediately again without any attempt at all to discuss on the talkpage, I suggest you move to discussion or I will be forced to report you again. Off2riorob (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
SPI
editYou are the subject of a sock puppet investigation NickCT (talk) 16:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)