Jakeleglarry

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Joehazelton (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Constructive communications will be allowed on my user talk page per WP:CIV. Non-constructive personal attacks, non-supported opinions of sockpupptry, as well as snide and harassing comments will be removes, per WP:NPA and WP:AGF

In regards to this user User:Propol, his editing history speaks volumes of his delusional obsession and single minded purpose. see a SPA success story, well protected and all ways drawing first blood.

And finely, the sock puppet tag which Propol is unqualified to place, I will continue to remove that personal attack, because it's not true.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jakeleglarry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was block due to unfounded accusations of being a sock puppet by User:Propol who’s trying to protect his pov agenda on the Peter Roskam biography. I don't know what legitimate proof, you have, other then "it just feel that way". Your blocking is a a form of harassment, slander and this editors personal attack are ignored. IF you have proof, pray tell what it is, or is this just how kangaroos hop in the court of wiki? This is blatant and bold face hypocrisy and it does not go unnoticed how you treat editors on political biographies.

Decline reason:

You're either a sock or so close in behavior to be indistinguishable. Regardless, your behavior has been entirely unacceptable. — Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:46, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic