User talk:James086/2011/Archive4

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Nataliehealey in topic Deleted Page


The Signpost: 3 January 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2010
  Previous issue | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2010, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
  Previous issue | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2011, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
  Previous issue | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2011, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike 14:18, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

Can Buraucrats/Stewards take action against Vandalism?

Hi, Can Bureaucrats or Stewards take action against vandals or can only administrators?, and what about the higher users such as founders? MrAmberGold (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)MrAmberGoldMrAmberGold (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, they all can. Bureaucrats and stewards tend to leave the vandal fighting to others but there's nothing stopping them. To be a bureaucrat you have to be an administrator for a while (probably a couple of years) but a steward is an inter-wiki user and unlikely to bother with vandal fighting.

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
  Previous issue | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2011, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Page

Hi James

I recently created a page for Intuitive Business Intelligence and it was instantly deleted by Lectonar. I have tried contacting him numerous times and have failed to receive a response.

I would like to know why it was deleted as it is in exactly the same format as both the Version One & QlikTech pages with similar links etc. I have not used any sales puffs/peacock terms, which leaves me very confused as to why it was so abruptly deleted.

I wonder if you could shed some light on the situation?

Many thanks,

Natalie --Nataliehealey (talk) 09:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)