JamesAlfa
JamesAlfa, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi JamesAlfa! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Nagesh Kariyappa for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagesh Kariyappa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nomination of Vishal Bhujbal for deletion
editThe article will be discussed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... (I am not a sockpuppet of anyone. You suspected you did good but also listen of mine. I created Vishal Bhujbal and Nagesh Kariyappa because i thought it can be created. Because those articles stood for long time on Wikipedia, without any issues.) --JamesAlfa (talk) 15:46, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Both Speedy deleted because JamesAlfa is a suspected sock puppet of User:Arshifakhan61. Circumstantial evidence is the creation of two articles previously created by Arshifakhan61 and subsequently deleted. Key question: If not a sock (or a meatpuppet), where did JamesAlfa get the content and references to recreate these articles each in a single edit, with no development in own Sandbox or as drafts? David notMD (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- Reviewing admins should review both the deleted versions for each article; the blocking/deleting admin confirmed to me that both the versions are identical for both articles. JavaHurricane 07:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Ok sir, but i will never do like this please unblock me. I'm a person of my words JavaHurricane JamesAlfa (talk) 07:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)