JamesWelwyn
October 2012
editPlease do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Steven Moffat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. MarnetteD | Talk 21:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Fern Britton. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Your edits to List of Doctor Who serials
editHi there. I undid your recent edits to List of Doctor Who serials. While your reasoning might have some value, Wikipedia is concerned with verifiability and those specials are considered a separate entity by both official and reliable sources, which is why they have their own entry in both the overview and the article. If you wish to challenge this and are able to provide sufficient sources to back up your claim, please discuss it on the talk page first. Repeating the same edit again and again will be considered edit-warring and will most likely be sanctioned by (temporary) removal of your editing privileges. Please also see WP:BRD which describes the best way to continue after one's BOLD edit has been reverted. Regards SoWhy 23:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Doctor Who serials, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)