Jan DL account

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dino-lite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker^talk 18:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Jan DL account, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! j⚛e deckertalk 18:11, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dino-Lite (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dino-Lite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vrac (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dino-Lite (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dino-Lite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out let's discuss it 11:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dino-Lite concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dino-Lite, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dino-Lite

Hello, Dino-lite. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dino-Lite".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. samtar ^{t} 20:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jan DL account (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Jan DL account (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I did not know the user name guidelines and was able to use this old user name for a long time, then it got blocked. Please continue the account with the new user name or suggest and appropriate user name for this account Dino-lite (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I've renamed and unblocked your account. PhilKnight (talk) 02:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, the account Dino-Lite was blocked by Tokyogirl79 because it is the name of an organisation. I would like to have an account name change so that i can continue to use the account. Here are a few key questions:

• Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
• Do you understand conflict of interest?
• Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the three important principles above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I understand all of the above and i am not trying to promote Dino-lite, i have been trying to write a legitimate encyclopedia entry about a noteable line of products. So far what i have written was not accepted or published in Wikipedia so i will not be able to violate any principles (that i fully understand and respect) untill i have been able to write a lemma that is not considered promotional. I believe that what i have written so far is not promotional and is in perfect line with other lemmas about products and companies - if you are willing, please compare what i have written to lemmas about 'old' companies like Nikon, Zeiss, Canon. The only difference imho is that Dino-Lite is a new company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.153.198.178 (talk) 14:02, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

It is silly to compare the notability of your company with the notability of Nikon, Canon, etc. Nikon and Canon easily meet WP:CORP notability requirements, and those articles have been created and developed by numerous editors that do not have conflicts-of-interest. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)