You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Janekouch (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Materialscientist is a complete fucking retard. Check the reverts of my edits he did. Absolutely retarded.

Decline reason:

I don't know about the accuracy or otherwise of your edits (boxing is a closed world for me), but you have gone about things in the right way - the right way to get blocked. Edit summaries are not for insulting other people. Nor are requests for unblocking. If you try again politely, and explain politely why your edits were made, someone who knows boxing might be kind to you. Go on like this, and you've got as much chance as a snowball in the Sahara. Peridon (talk) 00:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.