Janiovj

Talk:Brazil

Obrigado pelas argumentações na Talk page do artigo Brazil. Eu iria entrar na discussão se meu inglês não fosse péssimo. Dê uma olhada na talk page do User:Opinoso, estou "tentando" falar com ele. Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 03:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Olhe o que eu escrevi na discussão do artigo. A propósito, nasci em Florianópolis e vivo em Curitiba. Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 03:39, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Vo sabe... parece um rejeitado pela pátria. (rs). Sei lá, talvez ele viva num lugar desse país que não seja tão bom... Felipe C.S ^{( talk )} 04:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Please, do not write pathetic things in my talk page, you are not even into this discussion.

By the way, let me teach you: English names are of Germanic origin, since English language is Germanic.

Why don't you get a job, maybe an office-boy. Work there for some 20 years, enough to earn enough money to travel to Europe and learn something about it. Opinoso 15:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Did I ask you anything? I do not care about your poor life. Get out. Opinoso 17:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Large German cities have many immigrants, mostly Turks. Berlim does not represent Germany as Santa Catarina does not represent Brazil. Opinoso 19:59, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

The Brazil article was excellent until João Felipe C.S started to post there and manipulate it. Belive it or not, Brazil article was once about to be considerated one of the best articles in Wikipedia. Now it is just pathetic.

João Felipe C.S came out with all his racist posts and destroyed it. Once he posted some 4 pictures of blond women from Germany in the article to represent Brazilians, saying they were from Brazil.

He stil erases any picture who talks about Africans and Indian Brazilians.

He is frequently vandalizing the Afro-Brazilian article, diminishing their numbers.

Recently he was vandalizing the article, erasing important information about how bad education system in Brazil is. He also erased information about poverty and posted a terrible picture of a favela at night.

He seems to be trying to create a fake Brazil.

By the way, the pictures in the article do not follow the other countrie's articles. Take a look at the USA article and see that the photos there are mostly of landmarks and pics that gives an idea about the country. The Brazil article is full of unecessary pictures, such as politicians and the Congress. They do not need to be there. It should be replaced with pictures of Brazilian cities.

The article looks terrible since João Felipe C.S started to manipulate it. Opinoso 20:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Brazil is not a White country, neither a Black one. Brazil is mixed-race, not only racially, but culturally.

I am not trying to create a Black Brazil. João Felipe C.S in the article is trying to claim that Brazil is a First-World country that reasambles Germany. A fake Brazil. Opinoso 20:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Brazilian states by population

ok — Guilherme ^(t/c) 01:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

hi

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Where did you learn English? You write better than many of my American friends. What country are you from? learnportuguese (talk) 01:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ArcherConquer.JPG}

Thank you for uploading Image:ArcherConquer.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)