User talk:Janweh64/old/Bonin Bough

Conflict of interest

At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Maintenance tag

@Smartse: I have declare my COI in the edit summary and on my userpage.

Why has a {{COI}} template been placed on this article when the doc file for the template says: Do not use this tag unless there are significant or substantial problems with the article's neutrality as a result of the contributor's involvement. Like the other {{POV}} tags, this tag is not meant to be a badge of shame or to "warn the reader" about the identities of the editors.

Do not use this tag if you can quickly solve the problem, e.g., by removing peacocking and puffery or by reverting the blanking of well-sourced criticism.

Do not use this tag to notify readers that an article appears to be partially or wholly autobiographical. If this is the case, please use the more-specific {{autobiography}} tag. Like the other neutrality-related tags, if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning. Be careful not to violate the policy against WP:OUTING users who have not publicly self-disclosed their identities on the English Wikipedia.

Where is the discussion?  —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 00:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

WP:GNG

@SwisterTwister: Please take a second look at this article. Here is a sample of just some of the articles that demonstrate significant coverage by secondary reliable sources. Where I can, I have also included links to their editorial team so you may evaluate their reliability.

• PR Week editorial Team: Newsmaker: Bonin Bough, Mondelēz International (2013)
• Advertising Age editorial team: PepsiCo Loses Digital Guru to Kraft (2012)
• The Drum editorial team: Bonin Bough talks his new hosting gig... (2016)
• Men's Fitness editorial team: B. Bonin Bough: The Creative Genius... (2016)
• Fast Company editorial team: Why Bonin Bough left Mondelez... (2016)
• New York Times: People and Accounts of Note (2007)

The New York Times considered him "of note" a decade ago and since then he has been written about dozens of times. I believe this meets WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 20:51, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

• Janweh64 Examining the sources above shows them to be announcements, interviews and similar and we would simply consider these as either press releases or casual notices (it's not a case of of its reliability, however, but how it weighs for notability), simply not the significant coverage needed. The NYT claim is good but we would need better focus in that instead. SwisterTwister talk 20:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
• @SwisterTwister: How can you call this PR Week article a press release: Newsmaker: Bonin Bough, Mondelēz International  —አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 21:02, 8 July 2017 (UTC)