Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Roblox, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 15:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Autoglass. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The article was validly redirected. No reason to undo that. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:03, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Pentalobe screw, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please discuss before making page moves. You've also done nothing to clean up any redirects broken by this move. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:35, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by In veritas was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
In veritas (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Japanesealphabet, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! In veritas (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

95% chance you're going to end up blocked soon

edit

I noticed you said something dumb at ANI, so I took a look at your contributions and found this: [1]. Explain that edit. And no, I do not care how long ago it was. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit