Jarvben

This is Jarvben's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution has a new comment

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your comment. However, I am slightly confused. There was little-to-no notability which the sources needed to confer. All assertions are factual (i.e. that certain public figures have published with the journal), and are supported by the links provided (directing you to the journal's site where the articles appear). To the extent that independent corroborating sources could be provided (i.e. author's own websites which have our articles listed under their publications), they were. Could you please explain how these citations might therefore be improved?(Jarvben (talk) 04:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC))Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution (March 22)

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Basically this page looks like the publication's website. We need WP:42

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Jarvben! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 06:27, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic