Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jasmine.tsui, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 03:48, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jasmine! It's Emily from GPP 105. Hope you're having a good semester so far! Wags1234 (talk) 03:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Peer Evaluation

edit

Hi Jasmine,

Employment Discrimination

Wow you've done a lot for this article! You're going to be adding 3 new sections, Consequences, Theoretical Bases, and Effots to Balence, as well as adding heaily to two other sections. It's all very well written and backed up with good sources. I think now what you should begin to start thinking about is where these three new additions are going to fit in best in the article.

Workforce Development,

For this section you've also added three great new sections and edited two existing ones heavily that I think will really contribute to the article. This is really good work with how much you're adding, again here I'd ask you where these new sections are going to best fit into your selected articles.

Good job! I wish I had more comments for you but this is really solid work, the only thing that I think could be added is where these new additions are going to fit into the articles. Dguar97 (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


Daisy Martin's Peer Review Your edits to the Employment Discrimination article are very good and have an encyclopedic tone. I think your edits definitely brought important points to the article and I liked that you included legal theories in your article.Daisymartin (talk) 07:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reponse

edit

Hi Jasmine, I'm not actually the Content Expert for your course - Ian (Wiki Ed) is. However a quick look shows that another student, NateMeihak, removed the material from the article when copying content from another sandbox. Nate, when you're moving material from a sandbox, please remember to make small edits. This can help prevent the removal of recent edits by other people. It's not that everything ever added to the page has to stay - rather it's more that the removed material could be something that really should be in the article. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Shoot - I was looking at an old class - you are with me. Sorry about that! I've left a message for the other student. I think it should be OK for you to see about moving your work back into the article. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Jasmine, I reverted NateMeihak's edit; please see if the article is the way you wanted it. Note: this isn't necessarily an endorsement (or a criticism) of everything or anything you added; it's merely a revert of another user's improper deletion. @Ian (Wiki Ed) and Shalor (Wiki Ed): Mathglot (talk) 10:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply