Hi ... it seems to me you are having trouble adding a picture. The trick is, you have to upload the file first, and add the link second. See Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. Let me know if I can help. -- ProveIt (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't work to just add an image link, you have to upload the file. -- ProveIt (talk) 15:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edit

edit

I noticed that Erased Paper keeps deleting your edits. To resolve the problem, leave a message in Erased Paper's discussion page. Hope you Editors can come to an understanding. =D Jumping cheese 02:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Skrawl

edit

Hi, could you explain why you reverted my changes to Skrawl? It is common that characters from a TV series be covered in the article on that series in the article for that series. Please also remember to use edit summaries. It lets other editors know what you're trying to do. NickelShoe 15:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries

edit

Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. —Mets501talk 14:24, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edit to Black organization(case closed) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 07:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Phantom of Baker Street

edit

Read your article The Phantom of Baker Street. In order for me to evaluate your article, may I ask the question: You have a Conan-centered or a Hiroki-centered view of the movie? Samuel Curtis 11:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Tips to Detective Conan/ Case Closed Ep Articles

edit

JasonBillie, thanks for your contribution on DC/CC eps; your coverage on the eps are really good.

But there are two suggestions:

  1. In some eps you forgot to put the category [[Category:Case Closed episodes]] to the end of thee article; remember to put it at the end of the article or the article would become an orphan.
  2. I made a Ep Nav (Template:Case Closed Ep Nav) that is a succession list of eps which can be put at the end of the articles. The usage is : {{Case Closed Ep Nav|[[Ep 1]]|Ep 3}} would give:

{{Case Closed Ep Nav|Ep 1|Ep 3}}


I hope the above would be useful for your project.

Samuel Curtis 04:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Doctor Roy Curien and Caleb Goldman

edit

Hi. I apologize in advance for being the bearer of bad news. I've nominated both the Doctor Roy Curien and Caleb Goldman articles you have created for deletion in an effort to clean up all House of the Dead-related articles. I wanted to let you know, so you can weigh in on the discussion and also so you can save the work to your computer in case it does get deleted. --Benten 20:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Monster Allergy characters

edit

Hi - it appears that you are creating a number of pages for characters in this series. The pages appear to have no sources or references, and the notability of the characters doesn't appear to support a separate page. I have tagged the main character articles for improvement, and will delete them should this not occur. The minor character articles are certainly non-notable.

The usual way to approach characters in fictional series is to create a "List of characters in Monster Allergy" article, or have the information in the main article. ELIMINATORJR 13:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Please do not continue to create articles on the minor characters of this story - they will be deleted. Please improve the above article or compile them into a single article with a list of characters. Thankyou. ELIMINATORJR 13:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Elena Potato

edit

Elena Potato, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Elena Potato satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Potato and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Elena Potato during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 14:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Ezekiel Zick

edit

Ezekiel Zick, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Ezekiel Zick satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezekiel Zick and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Ezekiel Zick during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 14:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of Monster Allergy characters

edit

List of Monster Allergy characters, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of Monster Allergy characters satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Monster Allergy characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of Monster Allergy characters during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ridernyc 14:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Zobedja Zick

edit

Zobedja Zick, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Zobedja Zick satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zobedja Zick and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Zobedja Zick during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 06:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

==Theo Barrymore==
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Theo Barrymore, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. DGG (talk) 07:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Greta Barrymore

edit

Greta Barrymore, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Greta Barrymore satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greta Barrymore and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Greta Barrymore during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


No content in Category:Monster Allergy characters

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Monster Allergy characters, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Monster Allergy characters has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Monster Allergy characters, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Operation: Jet Fusion

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Operation: Jet Fusion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Operation: Jet Fusion. Ridernyc (talk) 16:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lights! Camera! Danger!

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lights! Camera! Danger!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Lights! Camera! Danger!. Ridernyc (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Trouble with Clones

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Trouble with Clones, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Trouble with Clones. Ridernyc (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Evil Beneath / Carl Wheezer, Boy Genius

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Evil Beneath / Carl Wheezer, Boy Genius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Evil Beneath / Carl Wheezer, Boy Genius. Ridernyc (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

My Big Fat Spy Wedding

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article My Big Fat Spy Wedding, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of My Big Fat Spy Wedding. Ridernyc (talk) 16:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of List of Monster Allergy characters

edit

I have nominated List of Monster Allergy characters, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Monster Allergy characters (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Peripitus (Talk) 06:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of The Great Escape (Monster Allergy)

edit

I have nominated The Great Escape (Monster Allergy), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Escape (Monster Allergy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ridernyc (talk) 06:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Bewitched Party

edit

I have nominated Bewitched Party, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bewitched Party. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ridernyc (talk) 06:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Family Reunion (Monster Allergy)

edit

I have nominated Family Reunion (Monster Allergy), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Family Reunion (Monster Allergy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ridernyc (talk) 06:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of The Devourer

edit

I have nominated The Devourer, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devourer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ridernyc (talk) 09:01, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of The Devourer

edit

I have nominated The Devourer, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devourer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ridernyc (talk) 09:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Ancient Armory

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Ancient Armory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Ancient Armory. Collectonian (talk) 06:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Last Tamer

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Last Tamer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of The Last Tamer. Collectonian (talk) 06:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Milo McCrary

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Milo McCrary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Schuym1 (talk) 01:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Dr. Kozak

edit
 

I have nominated Dr. Kozak, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Kozak. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Samuel Gerard

edit
 

I have nominated Samuel Gerard, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Gerard. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. PHARMBOY ( moo ) ( plop ) 23:52, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Lock, Shock, and Barrel

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Lock, Shock, and Barrel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock, Shock, and Barrel. Thank you. --Unscented (talk) 16:13, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated List of fictional characters who can manipulate technology, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters who can manipulate technology. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 19:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ezekiel Zick

edit
 

The article Ezekiel Zick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All sourcing is primary. No out-of-universe notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ezekiel Zick for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ezekiel Zick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezekiel Zick (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Discovery Kids Ultimate Guide to the Awesome has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:12, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Monster Allergy characters has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Monster Allergy characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN (talk) 19:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Flux (comics) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flux (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flux (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TTN (talk) 23:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply