JayWalsh
Welcome!
Hello, JayWalsh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cary Bass (talk) 22:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Question
editI'd like to draw your attention to WT:Blocking IP addresses#Updates required? OrangeDog (τ • ε) 18:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Comments on Jimbo's talk page
editYour name came up at w:User talk:Jimbo Wales#File:Las Vegas7.JPG. - Stillwaterising (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
editThis is a kitten test!
Request for your perspective on SOPA
editHi Jay, there's currently an ongoing discussion about splitting the Stop Online Piracy Act page at Talk:Stop_Online_Piracy_Act#ONGOING_DISCUSSION_-_Splitting_the_Article. You've familiarized yourself with the entry before, and your insight and perspective on the matter would be appreciated. Hope to see you there, Sloggerbum (talk) 00:11, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
editHi JayWalsh,
You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.
Thank you.
Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
editHi JayWalsh- I can't figure out how to say this without sounding corny, (or kiss-butt-ey), but thank you for all the work you are doing to construct and reconctruct Draft Messages, and the other one thousand tasks relating to WKM's involvement in the opposition of the two Bills. It is not easy to take literally hundreds of well intentioned suggestions, and artfully piece them together. It isn't easy, period, to creat a message that has such critical importance weighing on every single word. Good luck with this, and thanks for your work and your time. Petersontinam (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Ping
editJay, I've emailed for The Signpost on the SOPA issue. Tony (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
SOPA form
editHi Jay, thanks for all your assistance with the SOPA project - just wanted to point you to [1] if you guys at the WMF are still looking for a form / tool. I'm sure the EFF would love to lend a hand. — Pretzels Hii! 22:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
SOPA initiative and preventative technical measures
editSince we're nearing the deadline for action, I want to be sure that this question made it to you (or someone on the team) in time. I could be mistaken, but I'm thinking that many of our articles could get temporarily downranked (or delisted) by search engine algorithms if they're crawled while substantially different in content. Needless to say that this would potentially reduce the campaign's effectiveness by a very wide margin. — C M B J 05:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks CMBJ - folks from the ops and engineering side of the tech team are aware of this, and they're reaching out to Google, Bing/Microsoft and others to advise them of this situation. As I understand it this is underway. JayWalsh (talk) 07:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Headline/structure of landing page
editThank you for all your work on the blackout action. I'm really glad WMF is doing this.
I just posted a note at Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Proposed_Messages#Crucial_copy_editing about what I think was the latest version of the landing-page message. I think the small change I made is crucial for reducing blowback from less sympathetic would-be readers. The headline is different but the content is the same. The basic idea is to make it clear that the blackout is in defense of Wikipedia, not just because Wikipedians don't like the legislation. I understand that the message needs to be a call for action. But the headline needs to do something else. People will react emotionally to a black page where their article should be. The headline needs to start there – with that feeling – and then the message needs to transform that feeling into the action we need them to take.
If I can help by responding to the current version, please do let me know. I wish I'd known about this sooner – I'd have been in touch before now. – Pnm (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
A Barnstar for You!
editThe Invisible Barnstar | ||
Behind the scenes, working tirelessly, making this a success! Petersontinam (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC) |
Zero
editIt may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— at any time by removing the Rehman 13:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
() — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.38.130.163 (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Contact by a reporter
editHello Jay,
I've been approached by a reporter wanting to interview me. I sent you an email, and would appreciate any thoughts you have to offer. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)