User talk:Jayab314/Archive 1

Home Talk (Archives: 1) Sandboxes: Podcast But Outside, Wie is de Mol? (Dutch season 10), Pandemic: How to Prevent an Outbreak, BLANKED Page Tabs

Archive 1

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jayab314. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

BB20 Jury answer

Hi, I noticed this edit and wanted to tell you to never be afraid to ask questions! As for the answer, no one knows for sure. There could be some sort of Jury twist as you mentioned there was a time in the past when America got a vote in the Jury. There was also a time in BB18 when the Jury had a Battle Back and the winning Jury member got to return to the game. So for now we'll just have to wait and find out. It shouldn't be too long. TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

No, I was just saying I counted wrong, there would be nine jurors, not eight. Thank you for responding and offering help! Jayab314 (talk) 02:35, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Jayab314

User:Jayab314, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jayab314 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jayab314 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jayab314. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

2018 TCs

Please keep in mind that Ava and Bolaven are not a part of the 2018 TCs since they formed in 2017. Please refrain from adding them in the future. Noah^Talk 17:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah The thing is though it wasn't my idea to add them. It was said in the talk page by Jason Rees (see here) that Bolaven was considered a part of the 2018 Pacific typhoon season by JMA and PAGASA. If we want to further this discussion, I would see more sense in continuing this discussion in the talk page and informing Jason Rees of the disagreement. If not, then we can come to a compromise by making a note or something saying two storms (Bolaven and Ava) were formed in 2017 but died in 2018. I would still like to see this brought to the talk page just to hear other people's opinions. Jayab314 (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

All further discussion will be here. Jayab314 (talk) 18:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

I tried to clean up the page. I experimented around a bit and made an infobox for the page. I hope that is more organized than what preceded it. Noah^Talk 05:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah: Thanks for doing all of that and adding Ava and Bolaven. I really appreciate it. The discussion was probably going to come up in a few days on whether or not to have 2018-2019 storms that spanned over New Years so I'm glad to have done it now. Again, thanks for taking the time to add them and then to freshen up the page. I hope this is the last time we'll disagree like that. Have a good 2019! Jayab314 (talk) 08:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

---

Idk about you, but the basin category seems to bloat the table a bit. I did have to remove the information you added to the EPAC section since the section is about the atmospheric and hydrological conditions that led to TC formation. Noah^Talk 14:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah: No, yeah I get it. I didn't realize it was for atmospheric abd hydrological conditions. I agree in that the basin column looks kind of weird and with the pictures makes each column pretty small. It also seems redundant because the information is already in the timeline. Jayab314 (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Im changing the Australian cyclone names back. I swear... these IP editors don't know what they are doing. Noah^Talk 14:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah: Ok, but if you revert make sure to keep the death and system totals accurate (150 systems and more than or equal to 1176 deaths) Jayab314 (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Last system to form is not the last system of the year... the last system for 2018 will be the last one of these to dissipate. Just so you are aware, 36W and 94P will likely be named in 2019 and thus be 2019 systems. Noah^Talk 22:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

@Hurricane Noah: Looks like 94P was just named Penny. Jayab314 (talk) 22:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

No, that was 93P... 93P became 08P when JTWC upgraded it to a TS. It was then named by BOM today. Noah^Talk 22:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

04F and the Australian TL are the same system. BOM confirmed the crossing of it into the south pacific. Noah^Talk 21:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

---

@Hurricane Noah: Hey, if you look at the edits on Tropical Cyclones in 2019, I just had to fix some major problems because... well you'll see. Would you help me "monitor" the page to make sure it doesn't happen again, I told them to look at the Bolaven and Ava thing in the 2018 article to see why I did it but yeah, we need to make sure this doesn't keep happening. Jayab314 (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

MTS Desmond

You should have waited until MeteoFrance officially declared the tropical storm, which it did just a few minutes ago. The JTWC is not the source of information for that; also, the wind speeds are in knots not mph. Please adhere strictly to what MeteoFrance says; take only 1-minute sustained winds from JTWC.--Jasper Deng (talk) 12:31, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Tropical cyclones

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept!

Noah^Talk 03:36, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Big Brother Canada (season 7)

Hello, Jayab314,

Thanks for creating Big Brother Canada (season 7)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

The tables you have added have no information in them, so I have hidden them until more information is known then they can be unhidden. MSalmon (talk) 12:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

@Boleyn: Ok, keeping them hidden is fine, but don't delete them. Jayab314 (talk) 12:13, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Just unhide the section (not the whole lot) which has the relevant information when it becomes available and remember to include a source. MSalmon (talk) 12:16, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@Sportsfan 1234: I want to talk to them but they keep using a different IP every time. I would've already discussed the situation if they had made an account. I did put a discussion up on the article's talk page about this situation too but so far there are no other opinions. I did, however, lay out in my edit notes why I was reverting their edits but it seems like they don't look at that either. My apologies, but if you have a way I can talk to them, I am all ears. Thanks! Jayab314 16:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit Dispute on Big Brother Canada (season 7)

So, if you go to the Big Brother Canada (season 7) article and scroll down, you'll see the Have-Not, Shortlist, and Voting history sections. IP editors keep making the same edit that I have to keep reverting. I have discussed this on the article's talk page, but I've got no responses. I've also put it in each of my reverts' edit notes and still they keep doing it. I have no idea how to talk with them since they're IP editors. Now, I am in an edit war and don't know what to do. These are the disputes:

1. After each name in the Have-Not and Shortlist sections, there should be commas. My reason for the commas is that this is season 7, and every other season (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6), they have the commas. The IP editors keep deleting the commas, even after I made a hidden note to keep the commas.
2. IP editors are insisting that "Voting history" should be changed to "Voting History", but in every. single. Big Brother season (US, Canada, UK, Brasil, Australia, etc.) it is "Voting history". I have no idea why they're not going to those other pages and changing that too, but it's getting on my nerves.

Obviously, this dispute has gone too far and I don't know what to do anymore. I have discussed this on the talk page, no response. I have discussed this in the edit notes, no notes back in their reverts. I have put the hidden notes in the actual article right next to each problem, they get deleted. Please help! Jayab314 17:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Jayab314, IPs still have talk pages although they're less likely to be seen. It may be best to visit Edit Warring Noticeboard or request semi-protectiom. I'll leave this open in case an admin helper comes along and wants to give their view. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 17:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: Thank you for directing me to those links! Although for some reason this one IP keeps changing every time so I can't create a talk page for them even if I wanted to. Jayab314 17:23, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Jayab314, Some IPs will change constantly without them even realising. A longer semi might be in order. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 17:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: Yes, I requested a semi-protection for at least one month, ideally until the season is over. Jayab314 17:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Jayab314, Hopefully someone will deal with it soon. Once your happy, add -helped to the help me Template RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 17:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: Yes, alright. Thanks for your help! Jayab314 17:42, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: It just got semi-protection until April 7!! Jayab314 17:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Jayab314, I'm aware, I let one of our admin helpers know. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 17:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Wie is de Mol? (season 8) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wie is de Mol? (season 8), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 14:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: Ok that makes sense... was going to work on refs today. Thanks for informing me! Jayab314 22:25, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jayab314, Greetings. Thank you for adding some sources into the draft page. However, the sources you provided (all but one) are not independent from the subject. pls note that we need sources that are independent, reliable sources with significant coverage that talk about the subject (Wie is de Mol) in depth and in length and no mainly passing mentioned. Sources such as from major newspapers would be acceptable. Since this show is on the its 8 seasons, it is easy to find sources to support the contain claimed. Sources in any languages are acceptable. Once yo have added the sources, pls resubmit the page. The backlog is huge at the moment and if you want me to review it after sources are added then let me know. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:30, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: I added some more sources and submitted the article for submission. Jayab314 23:03, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jayab314, The sources your provide are not independent as they are associate with the subject. Since it is the 8th season, it would not be hard to find sources from newspapers of this series. Kindly find a few and added them in. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: I have serious tried looking for sources for hours, but as it was made in 2008 and is only popular in the Netherlands, it makes it all the more difficult to find newspapers from 11 years ago from the Netherlands talking about this one season of Wie is de Mol? Jayab314 10:05, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jayab314, Sources can be in any languages. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: Yes I understand that, but I just cannot find newspapers that have talked about season 8. All I can find is season 19, the season that finished up a few weeks ago, and some from season 18. Jayab314 20:28, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jayab314, Could you able to find any source regarding the show itself (not about the session 8)? if you could then you would use the sources in the lead section (write a brief info about the show) and add the source to it. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Samantha/Sam

You told me to stop changing Sam to Samantha because the rule is the page should match the chyron in the show. Well the chyron in the show has always said Samantha and not Sam. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.78.10.136 (talk) 01:14, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of James Charles & Tati Controversy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Charles & Tati Controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Charles & Tati Controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019 WPTC Newsletter

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Newsletter/Archive 37 Noah^Talk 22:45, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Circle (U.S. TV series)

The article The Circle (U.S. TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The show seems to be in the casting stages at the moment (see official website). Text of the article is copied from The Circle (UK TV series).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 14:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – June 2019

Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019

Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Reviewer's Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for reviewing articles under pending changes protection. Thank you PATH SLOPU 13:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

@Path slopu: Thank you so much! This is my first ever barnstar so it really means a lot! Jayab314 13:47, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andy Murray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Venus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheDoctorWho (talk) 00:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@TheDoctorWho: I went ahead and responded with a reason and another viable option in the talk page. Jayab314 01:45, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jayab314: Responded with a in depth explanation as well as an easy fix. Sorry 'bout that btw didn't realize it was you when I nominated or I would've come here before nominating. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jayab314: Alright this one was nominated for a different reason but I think it meets the criteria. An admin will eventually come through and make a decision on this one too. If the image is deleted I'll fight for it and talk with the admin by either taking it to Deletion Review or Files for Discussion if needed depending on what happens. Hopefully it all works out! TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Why Women Kill socialites, August 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Why Women Kill, season 1 socialites.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Editing Table

I did not mean to vandalize the page for Survivor: Island of the Idols. I wanted to include an extra row for the merged tribe, but I couldn't add an outline for the finish row. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.184.176 (talk) 23:56, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@99.157.184.176: Oh, I understand now. I thought you meant something different by your edit summary. I went ahead and fixed the table like you asked. For the future though, I would recommend making the request on the talk page so someone can do it. Jayab314 00:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Hurricane Dorian

	Nice to meet you ~
	~ you know ~ ever since I took the Evelyn Woodhead Speed Reading Course my gammer ~ grammer~ grammar ~ has deteriorated 100% ~ thanks for your grammar edits ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Survivor: Winners at War

The article Survivor: Winners at War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article uses sources from a singular spoiler site, Inside Survivor. The other site sourced, Reality Blurred, also uses information from Inside Survivor. The screenshot Instagram post with a picture of a logo also cannot be used as a valid source, since 1) the person in question is clearly a tourist who just met Steven Bradbury, not affiliated with CBS, 2) does not state "Winners at War" is the fortieth season", and 3) is a screenshot of the Instagram post, which could mean that it make doctored (either by Photoshop or through the Source Editor). The last time an article for Survivor used only sources from Inside Survivor, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor: Edge of Extinction, it was stated that "sources that have been presented were shown to not be WP:RS".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sinjoh2015 (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

@Sinjoh2015: Please see my responce on Talk:Survivor: Winners at War, and please add back all mentions of the article as it has not yet been deleted. Thanks! Jayab314 20:27, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Survivor: Winners at War for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Survivor: Winners at War is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor: Winners at War until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ApprenticeFan work 08:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)