Dear Jayanta1952. The series of Brahmoism articles are open to everyone to edit and contribute purposefully. Since this is a newly created user ID, I am at a disadvantage concerning your previous edits and POVs if any. You are obviously learned from the G.C.Chatterjee citation for Brahmananda. The Hinduism issues are open, but let us at least make the Brahmoism pages more inclusive first before tagging or affiliating them in advance with a POV bias. Best Regards. Yvantanguy (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Jayanta, I am replying to the message you left on my Talk page. There is no group. The fact that recent editors of "Brahmo" pages are behaving like a circus "Some one deletes, another puts in something sensible, a third one is abusive and a fourth appears apologetic. Good circus" shows that there are different opinions being incorporated - some of which are "sensible" . Unfortunately some of us appear closely involved with the issues and historical subjects - there may be conflict of interests involved - which we must guard against and be alert for. Under the circumstances,it would be better to edit conservatively instead of fanning the flames. Consider remarks like "But you started off with a destructive attitude, caring two hoots about others" which are not conducive to tolerance. Yvantanguy (talk) 05:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)