Jaybreeze123
| This user is a student editor in Cal_State_Fullerton/COMM_500_Theory_and_Literature_of_Communication_(Fall) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Jaybreeze123, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Peer Review
editHi Jay, Im Isabel from class and I will be doing your peer review.
History Section:
The history is strong with detailed facts about the evolution of the pluralistic ignorance. I would look at the organization of the first paragraph or a possible rewording to help readers understand what "literal attitude behavior inconsistency" is and its association to what pluralistic ignorance is. This is a slight issue but it would help improve clarity.
Causes of Divergence in Public vs. Private Opinion Section:
Introduction of the section could use some further detail to introduce the three causes.The three sections are strong though and they provide good examples. To strengthen these sections I would maybe look at providing other potential examples but could be left as is.
Consequences:
Organization wise, maybe consider making group think and bystander effect subheadings in this section-this is just a thought. You mention public issues at the beginning, look at potentially expanding this or maybe even making a section in this section delving deeper into current public issues.
Related Phenomena Section:
This section could use more sources or expansions, it just didn't feel as fleshed out as the reset of the article. Also be cautions of the language avoiding "we"-just a little thing.
Overall this is pretty solid, just don't forget to add images and proof read! Reading this was easy to understand as someone who is unfamiliar with the subject. I think that you have a good foundation and have a great idea of where you are going. Fleshing out those two sections (consequences and related phenomena) would be a good way to get it ready for final submission. Best wishes!