Jayhalobeast
Welcome!
Hello, Jayhalobeast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Color Morale, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb (talk) 03:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Color Morale
editA tag has been placed on The Color Morale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 03:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- See WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved before they can have a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 10:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A Day to Remember. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GunMetal Angel 00:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- If a mirror could show how ignorant your statements are, it would laugh too. For one, emo is a part of A Day to Remember's music genre and has been sourced, furthermore, read the article for emo to understand what it actually is. Secondly, we don't do opinions, which is everything that you are doing, Wikipedia runs on sources, not what a fan thinks or says. • GunMetal Angel 00:52, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well if someone was willing enough to make a problem out of something that is stated within an encyclopedia, I think anyone would have the imidiate impression that the person would be a fan of the subject. Otherwise, what are they? A troll? • GunMetal Angel 00:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- You have to be kidding me, don't make me laugh any further. You type and give off the very impression of a jackass straight out of 4chan. • GunMetal Angel 01:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well if someone was willing enough to make a problem out of something that is stated within an encyclopedia, I think anyone would have the imidiate impression that the person would be a fan of the subject. Otherwise, what are they? A troll? • GunMetal Angel 00:55, 10 October 2010 (UTC)