Jbhrp3

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Phil Radford, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Phil Radford was changed by Jbhrp3 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-05-21T08:50:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Phil Radford page

Hello Jbhrp3, I restored the biographical data to the Phil Radford page because I don't think there is any advertisement going on. It's all verifiable biographical data. There are no donation appeals in the article, Greenpeace has never used the article in any donations appeals, and obviously there is nothing being sold. How could this be advertising? As the head of a high-profile environmental organization, I think Radford's biographical info is relevant and encyclopedia-worthy. MikeEG2001 (talk) 17:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)