User talk:Jbuskop/sandbox

Peer Review of Glacial Contributions

Gabriel Kachuck: Fantastic job! I think the article's tone is very much encyclopedic, and, for the most part, summarizes the relevant research to describe the glacial history of New England. At just a few points, I thought it could use a little more summary, especially with regards to the quote from Doughty and Thompson on erosional processes. There might be a way there to just summarize the controversy rather than quote the article itself. Also, I would pick a number of the references to Maine, and somehow contextualize them so that they seem more like examples of glacial processes in New England more broadly. I would also make sure that the references in the article are using the wikipedia format of referencing (using the <ref> edit codes). Finally, I added a couple hyperlinks to the article, but I feel it could really benefit from being hyperlinked to the relevant wikipedia pages.

Jon here: I agree with Gabe, your article is solid and has a wealth of information. I went through and added a few more hyperlinks, but other than that, the only thing I can think of that your article needs is some slight tweaking on the citations to match up with the Wikipedia style in the final product. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewEnglandRocks (talk • contribs) 01:24, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

James: Great job, you two have good general information and in depth clarification on the examples you discuss with, relevant implications from these instances. The scope of your information is also diverse and gives limited perspectives tools to understand broader geologic concepts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesmatias (talk • contribs) 15:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)