December 5, 2012

edit

This looks great. Daniel

December 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jchevali3244, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just rewrote the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory action research page, a topic I know well. Tried to save it, without success. Your help would be appreciated. Jchevali3244 (talk) 23:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Jchevali3244]]Reply

Nothing in the page history... at a glance, I'd say your edit is probably lost, I'm afraid. What message did you get when you tried to save the page? Yunshui  09:14, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
No wait, it's here: Participatory action research. Different page from Participatory. Your edit has saved successfully, and is the current version of the page. Yunshui  09:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Participatory action research

edit

Hi there.

I've just come across the article about participatory action research, which I notice that you made major changes to about a year ago. I have left a message about the article at Talk:Participatory action research#Page rewritten, which you may be interested in.

By the way, on talk pages, it is customary to put new posts at the bottom. People get used to going to the bottom to find newer stuff but this does still leave the potential for seriously old stuff to hang around long after the conversation has passed. For this reason we tend to archive old threads. I have set up a bot to archive old threads of Talk:Participatory action research and hopefully it will do that soon, leaving the thread you started.

Yaris678 (talk) 23:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have made a change to the article about participatory action research. Hopefully that makes it clearer, to the uninitiated, what PAR is. Any thoughts? Yaris678 (talk) 10:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Participatory Action Research, Chevalier and Buckles.jpg

edit
 

A tag has been placed on File:Participatory Action Research, Chevalier and Buckles.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:21, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Participation, Action and Research in a Venn Diagram, Chevalier and Buckles.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, no obvious encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply