User talk:Jdicke16/sandbox

Jacob, I like your piece a lot. One thing that would help a lot is to include a section: "Conditions under which capital strikes are effective." You might the write up some of the causes that contribute to a successful capital strike. Also, you might include a section on the history of capital strikes. You reference a couple of international examples, but what's the non-literary origins of the term. What have scholars said on the topic. Also, you might include a country where capital strikes are particularly common and talk about capital strikes in that country.Cassell04 (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Article Evaluation:

I definitely think this article is off in the right direction. It reads well, is informative, relative, and impactful/applicable to any state in the world. I especially like how you linked the historical references to their impacts. Those two sections bled right into one another very well; in a problem-solution way. Coincidentally, I was just reading about Chile and the operations that took place to emplace Pinochet, very interesting to see this side of that complicated story. It makes me wonder when this tactic was first employed by business? As you said yourself, it is very difficult to determine if a sharp pullback from a firm is planned, spiteful, natural, or just poor management. I think companies can always play either hand to suit their needs and climate.

You've also done a very good job sourcing this article, keep it up and maybe Investopedia will copy your Wikipedia page too. Royo322 (talk)Arroyo —Preceding undated comment added 20:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)