Jdnaciones

Proposed deletion of Juan David Moreno

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Juan David Moreno, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No evidence this person exists

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Closedmouth (talk) 07:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Juan David Moreno

A tag has been placed on Juan David Moreno requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawnpoo (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Pérez Ariño

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David Pérez Ariño, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE because it is about a footballer who has not yet played in a fully-pro league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney (talk) 02:18, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

David Pérez Ariño

Hello. I noticed that you removed the PROD from this article and changed the infobox to show that Pérez Ariño has four appearances in the league. When I checked the golgolgol.net website, it shows that Pérez Ariño has not played any matches for Millonarios this season. Do you have a link which shows he played four matches in the league? Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I have now raised an AfD for the article in question. Could I remind you not to create any more unreferenced articles which is against Wikipedia BLP policy, it is essential to incluse at least one reliable source when creating biographies. Please note that it is also against Wikipedia PROD policy to remove a PROD without adding a reason in the article talkpage or directly addressing the concern (by providing a reference in this case). Regards King of the North East 23:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Millonarios

Please take a look at your discussion page in Spanish. [1] Also please do not add yet the changes at Club Deportivo Los Millonarios because it does not happen yet, it will be at the end of Apertura Tournament. ::::::100 % Bogotano:::::: (Quejas y reclamos) 19:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Repost of David Pérez Ariño

A tag has been placed on David Pérez Ariño requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. King of the North East 21:43, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Repost of David Pérez Ariño

A tag has been placed on David Pérez Ariño requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. King of the North East 21:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Repost of David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño

A tag has been placed on David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Jogurney (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Reposting deleted articles

Hello. I've noticed that you have reposted the information in the David Pérez Ariño three times since it was deleted following a discussion. Please address the concerns raised in the deletion discussion (i.e., provide sources which show that he has played in a fully-pro league or otherwise has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources) before you repost this a fourth time. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Rubén Mina

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Rubén Mina. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 06:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Yuber Asprilla

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Yuber Asprilla. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 06:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño (futbolista colombiano)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño (futbolista colombiano). Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 06:34, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Jdnaciones! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 18 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 697 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. David Jhonatan Pérez Ariño (football player) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Yuber Asprilla - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Rubén Mina - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Juan Sebastián Villate - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Cristhian Subero - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Víctor Salazar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Luis Hernán Mosquera - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Edier Tello - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Elkin Blanco - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Carlos Andrés Ramírez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Claritas § 18:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Claritas § 19:08, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicolás Pareja Escalante

The article Nicolás Pareja Escalante has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Information is unverifiable. No one with this name has played in a league or cup match for Millonarios senior team in the past 3 years according to golgolgol.net. If such a person exists, he is likely a non-notable youth or reserve team player.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Eduardo Pimentel.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Eduardo Pimentel.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jdnaciones. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jdnaciones~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jdnaciones. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jdnaciones. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Pérez (footballer)

The article David Pérez (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:GNG; the only coverage available is statistics database entries.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of David Pérez (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Pérez (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pérez (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)