Welcome!

Hello, Jdoggiedogg, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. PunkyMcPunkersen (talk) 00:41, 22 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

File source problem with File:SPC Exterior.jpg

edit
 

Thank you for uploading File:SPC Exterior.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 07:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I created all the content myself and did not cut and paste from websites or other sources.Jdoggiedogg (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC) I just tried to add the appropriate Licensing notation. I'm still new to Wikipedia, so I hope I did it right. If you don't like that photo, I can go take another. I only live about 20 minutes from the SPC.Jdoggiedogg (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sacred Paths Center for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sacred Paths Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Paths Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 18:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Paganistan

edit
 

The article Paganistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article consists mostly of original research and references to self-published sources. Reducing to what is referenced with arguably reliable sources (books printed by other than vanity presses) would leave little more than a dictionary definition. Might be worth a mention in Minneapolis – Saint Paul but not a dedicated article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 23:11, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paganistan for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paganistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paganistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 11:28, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Paganistan for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paganistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paganistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RadioFan (talk) 11:49, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply