Jdsteakley
Welcome to Wikipedia
|
Image tagging for File:Parayar School Children.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Parayar School Children.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Correcting a typo in an article title
edit{{help me}}
Can you please tell me how to edit the title of an article? I found one with an obvious typo. Jdsteakley (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think you are autoconfirmed, so you don't have permission to do that. Please tell me the rename you would like, and I'll do it for you. fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for offering to make the correction on an article title. It is: Whistling Woods International Institute for Films, Media, Animationa and Media Arts. There is an extra a on Animation.--Jdsteakley (talk) 20:49, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- To 'rename' an article, we use a process called WP:MOVE. Please read about it before trying! Thanks, Chzz ► 16:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Commons Ambassador barnstar
editThe Commons Ambassador Barnstar | ||
I hereby award you the Commons Ambassador barnstar for all of your work classifying files on Commons plus making sure that images from English Wikipedia get transferred to Commons. Your work is noticed and appreciated! Royalbroil 12:47, 23 May 2009 (UTC) |
Images to Commons
editHi. I notice you copied a bunch of my images to Commons. At least I think that's what happened. I'm having a little trouble understanding how this works. The ones you did, a template says, "This file is now available on Wikimedia Commons as File:William Van Altena House May09.jpg." And I can still edit the image page, and it still has the Wikipedia categories, and such. But some others, that were done some time ago say "This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons. The description on its description page there is shown below." And I can't edit them or categorize. Can you explain this to me, or direct me to some resource regarding the "Commonizing" of images? I'd appreciate it. -Freekee (talk) 19:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- -- Hi, Freekee. First of all, thanks for photographing all those sites and uploading them. I want to go to work on Madison sites in the same sort of way. As for Commons, you probably already know some or most (or all) of what appears at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_commons>, which kind of explains the rationale for moving images from English-language Wikipedia to Commons. I'm not at all sure why you can't edit or categorize certain images that are now on Wikimedia Commons. Can you give me an example of one to take a look at? Jdsteakley (talk) 04:00, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- See File:Cedarburg-mill-pagoda.jpg. Notice there are no edit links. This was uploaded to WP, and then moved to Commons. -Freekee (talk) 04:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oops, nevermind. I just checked my watchlist. After you moved the images to Commons, another user deleted the ones from WP. Okay, so what are the criteria for moving images there? Any free image? Should I be uploading them there in the first place? -Freekee (talk) 04:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Right, I think that generally it's better to upload images to Commons rather than to English Wikipedia. And if you've got the time and interest, it helps to transfer other peoples' images from English Wikipedia to Commons. (I initially got on to this because I've been a lot more involved with German Wikipedia than English Wikipedia since first becoming a Wikipedian last November.) Without looking back at the files of yours that have been deleted, I'm guessing it might have been royalbroil who did it, because he's an admin who can make such deletions. Yesterday he gave me a Commons barnstar for moving files to Commons. Quite a number of them were his images. Jdsteakley (talk) 12:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm acquainted with Royalbroil, and I think he's done some of mine in the past, but the latest ones were done by Luk and by Athaenara. The only issue I have with having images there instead of here is that the categorization is removed from here. Shouldn't there be a mention on the upload page, something like, "if your image is suitable for Wikimedia Commons, please consider uploading it there", at the very least? You guys are doing a lot of work moving all these images over. I've been editing here for several years, and still didn't know the deal on the Commons. -Freekee (talk) 16:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Can you tell me more precisely what sort of categorization is removed when an image gets moved to Commons, or point me to an example? And what you propose, a mention of Commons on the upload page, does exist. When you are on an English Wikipedia page and click on "upload" over on the left, you get this page: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload>. It specifically suggests that you instead upload the image at Commons. Jdsteakley (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- It just changes from WP/EN categorization to Commons cats. Not a big deal, I guess. That's not the page I get when I click "Upload file" on the menu bar. I get <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload>. I wonder why you get a different page. Is that an issue with skins? So I was looking at the page you linked. It took me a minute to realize that you're supposed to click on the image type that you want to upload, and it will take you to a specialized upload page. Interesting. And I see that there's a huge banner about the Commons on the free image upload page. -Freekee (talk) 20:20, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- Can you tell me more precisely what sort of categorization is removed when an image gets moved to Commons, or point me to an example? And what you propose, a mention of Commons on the upload page, does exist. When you are on an English Wikipedia page and click on "upload" over on the left, you get this page: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload>. It specifically suggests that you instead upload the image at Commons. Jdsteakley (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I'm acquainted with Royalbroil, and I think he's done some of mine in the past, but the latest ones were done by Luk and by Athaenara. The only issue I have with having images there instead of here is that the categorization is removed from here. Shouldn't there be a mention on the upload page, something like, "if your image is suitable for Wikimedia Commons, please consider uploading it there", at the very least? You guys are doing a lot of work moving all these images over. I've been editing here for several years, and still didn't know the deal on the Commons. -Freekee (talk) 16:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Image?
editI notice you added File:Benjamin Church House.jpg, to the NHRP list, but it doesn't seem to be showing. -Freekee (talk) 03:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm . . . not quite sure what the problem might be. I can see the image okay. I do notice that sometimes images fail to show up even in regular articles, and then if you click on reload (once or twice or three times!), they finally come up. I just figured this was some kind of minor system problem. Btw, I'm not very happy with the photo of the Benjamin Church House, since it's an old black and white photo from many years ago. Would you be interested in making a new photo of it? I also added crummy old black and white images of Immanuel Presbyterian and the Old Soldiers Home. Would you want to photograph them? -- And now I'd like to get back to something you asked earlier about the pictures moved to Commons. You remarked that some of your pictures that were moved a while ago by others had now been deleted in English Wikipedia, so that they exist only in Commons. I think that's what admins are supposed to do, just to prevent the redundancy and save storage space on the server. But you went on to remark that you could not edit your pictures on Commons, because there's no edit tab at the top of the page, and as an example you pointed me to your Cedarburg pagoda. Well, you can get to an edit tab. You just have to click on the blue link within the sentence: "The description on its description page there is shown below." (The words "description page" are the blue link.) The new page that comes up has all the edit tabs etc. at the top. Jdsteakley (talk) 14:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, Estabrook Park! I was using Geohack to locate sites for my last photo hunt, and the location it gave me for the Church House didn't make sense, so I skipped it (I did the entire rest of the north shore that day). If I'd just read the article, I could have figured that one out. I should be able to get that one within the next week. Funny you should mention the Old Soldiers Home. The first time I went out looking for pics, I took all the remaining Historic Landmarks in Milwaukee (got five, couldn't find the sixth). On that day, I was at the VA center, and took a pic of the building, but I didn't know if was on the list, so I didn't shoot a pic suitable for WP.
- The Church House pic still isn't showing for me. Maybe I have to clear my cache or something. Funny, it does show up for me here, though the article showed a different image at that time. It was another one of Sulfur's deleted pics with the same name as the current file.
- As for the images, when I said there were no edit links, I was talking about WP/EN. But I've since discovered how that all works. When some WP/EN image pages had links, and some didn't, even though they were all on Commons, that was because the WP images hadn't been deleted yet. And I've also discovered how to make categories just for WP/EN on the Commons images. So it's all good, I guess. But I'm still curious why you have a different upload page than I do. -Freekee (talk) 04:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- I got the pic. -Freekee (talk) 15:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nice picture!Jdsteakley (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! -Freekee (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nice picture!Jdsteakley (talk) 16:52, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Dane County photos
editI notice you enjoy photographing historic buildings and have added numerous photos to the Dane County NRHP article. That is great! You might wish to read Perspective control and Perspective control lens. If you do not use an SLR with a PC lens, check out "Perspective control in software" in the latter article.
I suggest, also, you that not replace perfectly fine existing photos with your photos just to have your photo there instead.
Motorrad-67 (talk) 14:12, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, Motorrad-67! Thanks for writing. Yes, just in the past couple of weeks I have added quite a few pictures to the Dane County NRHP article, and I'm closing the gap. Now I've got to try to find the various mounds -- so far I've only photographed two. I've also added a few photos to the Milwaukee County page and hope to add more. I recently made a trip to Des Moines and shot a few for the Polk County, Iowa, page, and hope to visit Des Moines again next summer for some more. (The weather was kind of overcast when I was there.)
- I am not using an SLR, just an inexpensive and somewhat broken digital camera (Fuji Finepix) that does not have perspective control. But I have modified the perspective on a number of pictures using Photoshop. By the way, on the page you recommend on "Perspective Control," one illustration is of Madison's Bashford House. Did you notice my photo of it on the Dane County NRHP page? That was modified with Photoshop.
- As for replacing your photo of the Lutheran Church with mine, it seemed to me -- without consulting with you about it in advance -- that there were a few advantages to the photo I uploaded yesterday. The first, and of course this is a matter of "perspective" (haha), is that your photo contains a motorcycle, which some might regard as detracting from the picture. Please be assured I do appreciate fun features (the Travelocity gnome at the Eiffel tower, the Great Wall of China, etc.). The second thing is that the photo I uploaded has the dimensions of 2,848 × 2,136 pixels, whereas yours is 600 x 592 pixels. Wikipedia has language on the upload page encouraging users to make use of the largest photo (and highest resolution) they have, which I've taken to mean that bigger is to be preferred. Third, the photo I uploaded has a somewhat detailed description containing information that is not otherwise available on Wikipedia, since there's no article on the First Lutheran Church. And finally, I did add your photo to mine under the "Other versions" rubric, and vice versa, so that anyone who viewed my file would be guided to yours. One thing I do like about your photo of the church is that it is a straight-on view (I'm not sure what the photographic lingo for that is), whereas mine is slightly angled to the side, which suggests more about the length of the building. But I'm happy to leave your photo where it is, on the Dane County page. What I might consider doing is copying the information on the church from my picture to yours. Would you mind?
- It occurs to me after reading your message that up to now I haven't marked my uploads so that I'm notified if there are any changes to them. Perhaps I will start doing that....
- I was interested to read on this page that you don't want your photos moved to Commons without your permission. Mind if I inquire what you see as the difference between a photo being on Commons versus on English Wikipedia? I've uploaded all of my photos to Commons, since I thought that's what Wikipedia wants.
Photos of FLW buildings in Madison
editNice shots of the Robert M. Lamp House and the Eugene A. Gilmore House. By any chance do you have any photos of the John C. Pew House (3650 Lake Mendota Drive), Eugene Van Tamelen House (5817 Anchorage Rd) or the Walter Rudin House (110 Martinette Trail)? --Waltloc (talk) 16:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind words. Sorry, I've never visited those three. One friend of mine here in Madison is a big FLW devotee, and he tells me that I missed an excellent tour a month ago that would have given me an opportunity to see more than I have to date. Apparently not all of the three you name are readily accessible. Well, I will just have to see what is possible. Jdsteakley (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Rowley House in Dane County NRHP table
editHi JD ... I see that you changed the spelling of the Rowley House listing in the Dane County NRHP list a while back from Newman C. Rowley House to Numan C. Rowley House. Are you certain of that spelling? This document has the spelling as Newman. I've emailed the Middleton Historical Society to see what they have to say, but I thought I'd check with you as well. What is your source for the Numan spelling? --sanfranman59 (talk) 18:15, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi again. FYI ... I heard back from Scott Bachmeier at the Middleton Historical Society. He says that the correct spelling is Newman. --sanfranman59 (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, you wrote back before I managed to reply. When changing the spelling to "Numan", I simply adopted the spelling of the name as it appears in a plaque on the front of the building. That plaque was put up by the Middleton Historical Society itself. Isn't it embarrassing that they have the name misspelled on their own plaque? -- Especially since the building houses the Middleton Historical Society. Well, that's Wisconsin for you.... Reminds me of all those handpainted signs I used to see when I was a kid with a backwards s. Hang on -- I will upload the plaque in a minute. Jdsteakley (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Here it is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rowley_House_Middleton_plaque.JPG Jdsteakley (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm ... interesting. A Google search on "Numan C. Rowley" returned one document with that spelling. I've emailed Scott again to see what he has to say about the plaque. As you probably know, it's not at all unusual for historical documents to have a variety of spellings for proper names. I run into this all the time when doing genealogical research on my family. Since both the Wisconsin Historical Society and the NPS have the spelling as Newman, I think it's probably best to use that in the Wikipedia NRHP table. I'll let you know if I hear anything further from Scott Bachmeier. --sanfranman59 (talk) 22:16, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Here it is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rowley_House_Middleton_plaque.JPG Jdsteakley (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, you wrote back before I managed to reply. When changing the spelling to "Numan", I simply adopted the spelling of the name as it appears in a plaque on the front of the building. That plaque was put up by the Middleton Historical Society itself. Isn't it embarrassing that they have the name misspelled on their own plaque? -- Especially since the building houses the Middleton Historical Society. Well, that's Wisconsin for you.... Reminds me of all those handpainted signs I used to see when I was a kid with a backwards s. Hang on -- I will upload the plaque in a minute. Jdsteakley (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar
editAlthough I don't think I deserve it. Ncboy2010 (talk) 02:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you don't mind in me messaging you. I have noticed you made an edit on A Little Bit of Cucumber not so long ago. Are you interested in music hall, variety etc from that era? Or was it a fleeting visit? The reason I ask is that Stanley Holloway has now been nominated at FAC, but it has only received one set of comments there. Because of this I am desperatly trying to drum up some support. If you can review the article and comment here it would be much appreciated. If you know of anyone else who might be interested in doing so then please direct them accordingly. All the best -- Cassianto (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
editI appreciate your improvement of the List of public art in Madison, Wisconsin, which needs all the help it can get. Thank you! --Jgmikulay (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- There's more coming. By the way, did you see my Nicholas Mirzoeff photo? --Jdsteakley (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
- LOVE the Mirzoeff pic! I hadn't seen it, and I like how his head is bisected by the two planes of color. I was sorry to miss his visit this week. I'm thrilled to hear that you'll be adding more to the sculpture list. Again, thank you! --Jgmikulay (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Verex Syzygy (O. V. Shaffer).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Verex Syzygy (O. V. Shaffer).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Easter Island Sculpture (Boyum).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Easter Island Sculpture (Boyum).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:04, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Mother and Child (William Zorach).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mother and Child (William Zorach).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:ACT (King).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:ACT (King).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Alexa (Susan Walsh).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alexa (Susan Walsh).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Awakening (George M. Cramer).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Awakening (George M. Cramer).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:10, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Blue Lantern on Tripod (Boyum).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Lantern on Tripod (Boyum).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Blue Urn with Dragon (Boyum).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Urn with Dragon (Boyum).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Creature Abstract Head (Boyum).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Creature Abstract Head (Boyum).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
editMessage added 14:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
And again. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Justice (Watrous).jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Justice (Watrous).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jim,
perhaps you are able to make the entries of this Wiki-article better: Bagno Centrale di Vienna and Central Bathhouse Vienna? It seems that the german article may be better than the english and italian... Piers Gaveston (talk) 11:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon in Madison
editHey Jdsteakley—I saw that you were listed as in Madison. If indeed you are, I wanted to invite you to a humanities edit-a-thon in the Madison Public Library on Friday, April 25th (1:30–3:30). It'll be on the shorter side and is aimed at new editors, but I hope to see you there. More information is available on the 2014 UW Conference on the Public Humanities website. Let me know if you have any questions czar ♔ 23:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- I am very interested, but unfortunately I will be unavailable on that date.--Jdsteakley (talk) 07:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Coming Out DVD cover.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Coming Out DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Coming Out cover.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Coming Out cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Coming Out DVD cover.jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coming Out DVD cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
File:Coming Out cover.jpg listed for deletion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coming Out cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 20:27, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Edit-a-thon in Madison
editJdsteakley, I'd like to invite you to an upcoming edit-a-thon:
- Saturday, March 5th, 9:30 a.m. – noon
- Madison Public Library (Madison, Wisconsin)
- Bring a laptop! There will be snacks and daycare
RSVP on the event page if you plan to attend or have any suggestions. czar 00:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
- You received this message because you are a member of Category:Wikipedians in Wisconsin. To opt-in to future Madison event messages, add yourself to the mailing list.
- I am very interested, but unfortunately I will be unavailable on that date.--Jdsteakley (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Jdsteakley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A page you started (Martin Sommerfeld) has been reviewed!
editThanks for creating Martin Sommerfeld, Jdsteakley!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks good. I've cited John Whyte's obituary of him.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! --Jdsteakley (talk) 11:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | ||
Thank you for uploading a picture of George Whitmore (writer)!Zigzig20s (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Jdsteakley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Jdsteakley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Joseph Buttigieg, minor edits
editHi there! Thanks for your contributions to Joseph Buttigieg. I wanted to touch base with two quick policy notes. First, I notice that you added a number of biographical details. By chance do you have published sources you could reference to verify this information? As Buttigieg is recently deceased and other, still living people are described, this needs to conform to WP:BLP sourcing policy, i.e. either to provide reliable sources or remove the information until it can be verified.
The other thing regards marking edits as minor--I know it's a bit odd, since this and probably many edits you make won't feel "major" but you need only mark an "minor" edit if it's something no one would ever disagree with. Grammatical errors, italicizing a book title if someone forgot, that sort of thing. Anything that changes the meaning for an entry in any way--even just adjusting phrasing--you can and should please just leave as a regular edit. The main difference it makes is that some people filter their watchlists to exclude minor edits, and therefore may not see and have a chance to review any changes marked as "minor". For this reason, it's an important point of community trust to use the "minor" designation only if you're really not changing anything anyone else might think we should do differently, so they have the chance to respond.
Thanks much! Innisfree987 (talk) 20:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Done. --Jdsteakley (talk) 23:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for the quick reply. Unfortunately the funeral home obituary--in contrast to one from a newspaper--is a self-published source so not acceptable under BLP policy unless signed by the subject (WP:BLPSPS). Any chance you're aware of other sources? If not that's ok, I can just trim out what's not verified by reliable sources; just wanted to check with you before I do in case the material can be confirmed and stay in. Thanks! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- The funeral home obit is identical with the newspaper obit already cited as reference 3, so I simply replaced the bad one with the good one. --Jdsteakley (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ah ok--yes, I see, it does look like that reference is the same problematic source. Appears to be a paid death notice rather than a reported obituary by a fact-checked source (legacy.com is a tip-off). Alright, no worries, I'll look around to see if I can find other sources for the info, and trim what I can't verify. Thanks for your help! Innisfree987 (talk) 18:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- The funeral home obit is identical with the newspaper obit already cited as reference 3, so I simply replaced the bad one with the good one. --Jdsteakley (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for the quick reply. Unfortunately the funeral home obituary--in contrast to one from a newspaper--is a self-published source so not acceptable under BLP policy unless signed by the subject (WP:BLPSPS). Any chance you're aware of other sources? If not that's ok, I can just trim out what's not verified by reliable sources; just wanted to check with you before I do in case the material can be confirmed and stay in. Thanks! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Any more info on the source here, please? 2.247.241.88 (talk) 22:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- I am sorry to report that I have been unable to locate any additional information on the source. --Jdsteakley (talk) 05:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editNomination of Les K. Wright for deletion
editThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les K. Wright until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article Otto Binswanger (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Per WP:2DABS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Deletion strikes me as entirely appropriate. Jdsteakley (talk) 17:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Category:Homosexual concentration camp survivors has been nominated for renaming
editCategory:Homosexual concentration camp survivors has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)