Jdtapaboc

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Deliverance, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Deliverance was changed by Jdtapaboc (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-28T22:56:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

ClueBot needs to get a clue. Jdtapaboc (talk) 22:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Verifiabilty

Hi, i have Islam and Slavery watchlisted and i just wanted to talk to you about Wikipedia:Verifiability. It is a very strange concept and utterly central to wikipedia. This encyclopedia trys to be NeutralPOV by noteing all major POV's. These POV's all think they are the TRUTH, our job is not to say who is right just who says what. This is controlled by the concept of RELIABILTY, ie Who do we listen to? Reliabilty decides that, academic sources are top of the list as well as court findings, below these government and NGO reports by notable people. Then the opinions of notable people then finally famous people.

That probably does not answer all your questions but feel free to ask me some. ^{(Hypnosadist)} 12:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)