Your submission at Articles for creation: Credibly (May 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jeffrey881! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:37, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Credibly (June 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Credibly

edit

  Hello, Jeffrey881. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Credibly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Credibly

edit
 

Hello, Jeffrey881. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Credibly".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:31, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Credibly (January 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
My apologies, I just submitted the new edit, accidentally submitted without publishing the changes @Qcne Jeffrey881 (talk) 15:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Jeffrey881, but now you have different problems. You shouldn't have any external links in the body of the text- if they are to be citations please cite them using the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.
More fundamentally though I am still not convinced this company meets our WP:NORG criteria. Most of your sources are press releases.
Finally, are you employed or contracted by Credibly? Qcne (talk) 15:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

edit
 

Hello Jeffrey881. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Credibly, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Jeffrey881. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jeffrey881|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Qcne (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Credibly (January 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sungodtemple was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Sungodtemple (talkcontribs) 17:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)Reply