User talk:Jengod/Archive2023-Q1-Q2

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Qwerfjkl (bot) in topic CS1 error on Robert Johnson (Tennessee)

hello and welcome to 2023

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Max Wenner
added a link pointing to Springer Spaniel
Universal City Zoo
added a link pointing to Harry Harvey

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Jengod!

edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Moops T 22:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Jengod. Thank you for your work on John Vincent Cain. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I don't think you need to go through review for your new articles. Loved this one about someone I never would have known about. I'd say keep up the good work, but you've been doing it for so long, do not want to appear condescending. Thanks for the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 13:24, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Positive feedback is like manna. Thank you for leaving this message. Anything but condescending. Very kind! jengod (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Jengod. Thank you for your work on Curley Stecker. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Don't let this go to your head, but another really neat article. Thanks for creating it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 18:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Max Wenner
added a link pointing to Llangwm
Stanisławów Ghetto
added a link pointing to Galicia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Max Wenner

edit

On 15 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Max Wenner, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that exactly how "man of mystery" Max Wenner fell from an airliner flying over Belgium remains a mystery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Max Wenner. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Max Wenner), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hook update
Your hook reached 12,706 views (1,058.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2023 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rudy Nappi

edit

On 15 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rudy Nappi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that illustrator Rudy Nappi based his cover art for the Nancy Drew Mystery Stories on summaries provided by his wife, who actually read the books? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rudy Nappi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rudy Nappi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Jengod. Thank you for your work on Maricopa Slim. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I'm a bit of an amateur Arizona (among others) history buff. This character was on my list of "at some point" writing about. Nice job as usual.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 12:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phidippus adumbratus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sierra Blanca.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted

edit
 

Hi Jengod, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:44, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you @Femke:! jengod (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

U.S. founders

edit

Thank you very much for creating the Founding Fathers of the United States page, an inspiration as it came in pretty late (2004) after Wikipedia's beginning. And especially good to have you back editing the page. I really like the John Trumbull addition as a patriot, something, like the page topic itself, that everybody else missed. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

My thanks, also. I share all of Randy's sentiments. We'll have to have 20th anniversary party next year. Be sure to bring the champagne. :) Allreet (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, Allreet, here are the results of Jengod's first edits on March 21, 2004, three years and two months after Wikipedia's creation (where was everyone else, asleep at the switch?). Notice how far along she progressed the page on that first day and set in motion many of the sections and concepts that remain as part of the page. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Bless you both. I cannot fathom where I got all that from. I imagine some corner of dot gov? Anyway happy to have laid a poorly sourced foundation stone for all that's come after. Cheers Allreet and Randy Kryn jengod (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

  • New collections:
    • British Newspaper Archive
    • Findmypast
    • University of Michigan Press
    • ACLS
    • Duke University Press
  • 1Lib1Ref 2023
  • Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

AFDs

edit

Hello, Jengod,

If you are going to participate in AFD deletion discussions, please take them seriously, evaluate the article and its sources and provide a policy-based reason for why you think the article should be deleted, redirected, merged or kept. One word answers, like you gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SLOOP Project (2nd nomination), are not a useful contribution to a conversation on what should happen with an article, it's just a "vote, and these are just dismissed by a discussion closer. Offer a thoughtful opinion that demonstrates your knowledge of how articles should be constructed. If you have time, look for additional sources that could support claims in an article under discussion. That would make a valuable contribution to any deletion discussion. If you find this too demanding of your time, then perhaps this is not an area of the project that is worth spending your time on and you could find other areas to make contributions to. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Founding Fathers of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Heritage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Well, ackshully" section...

edit

Please change the header name to something more appropriate, it looks like vandalism right now... ★Trekker (talk) 21:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Des Eschelles Manseau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archives nationales.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Debate to delete a category

edit

There is a debate over whether to keep Category:Homes of United States Founding Fathers as a category. More opinions are needed. The discussion is located here. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Maid (miniseries), but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. — YoungForever(talk) 00:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rsk6400 (talk) 12:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cemetery prairie

edit

On 12 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cemetery prairie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many surviving remnants of North American prairie grasslands are in cemeteries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cemetery prairie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cemetery prairie), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Precious

edit

nature preserved

Thank you for quality articles such as El Segundo blue (2004, having begun more than 500 articles that year), Let's-Read-and-Find-Out Science (2013), Ballona Lagoon (2022) and Cemetery prairie (2023), for a resourceful user page, for photographs of "bugs", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2814 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maurice Glickman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Museum of Art.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A bowl of strawberries for you!

edit
  Thanks for your work in draft space, Jengod! As an AfC reviewer I often come across drafts you have improved. S0091 (talk) 21:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Facilitation cascade

edit

Curious why you didn't boldly move into Mainspace. The article looks good, almost too good, yet has sat in AfC queue for months and presumably skipped by numerous reviewers. Anyway, wondering if I am missing something before I press accept. Slywriter (talk) 03:59, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Slywriter: Ha! I had no interesting motives whatsoever, I just "volunteer" in draftspace sometimes to help newbies who have created decent but slightly rough articles. I try to do a little editorial finesse stuff that might help them get approved and/or make things easier on admins etc. I wouldn't dream of publishing on my own authority. thanks for all you do! jengod (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
20 years, 75k edits... Should consider being on the AfC team to help those new editors. Also, in case you never seen, I find this cat useful as can tell what drafts are fresh vs lingering, CAT:AFC/AGE. Anyway, have fun. Slywriter (talk) 15:17, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Casa-Grande & Senzala
added a link pointing to Slave quarters
Olga Celeste
added a link pointing to Cook County Courthouse
Outbuilding
added a link pointing to Scale
Peter Claver
added a link pointing to Slave quarters

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

A card for you!

edit
  For future emergencies
Thanks for your help with the hook for Ward v. Flood. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:08, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rose–Baley Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prairie schooner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coon card, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems
added links pointing to Siwa, Basque Country, Maasai and Jowzan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

  • New bundle partners:
    • Newspapers.com
    • Fold3
  • 1Lib1Ref January report
  • Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhesus (river) (March 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Jengod! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Camp Latham
added links pointing to Native Americans and Trinity Journal
Culver City, California
added links pointing to Baldwin Hills and Ince
Santa Ana winds
added a link pointing to Goleta

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Girard (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Girard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Women who experienced pregnancy loss has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Women who experienced pregnancy loss has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gugrak (talk) 10:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Red circle

edit

Wouldn't it be better to have the original image instead of the one with the MS Paint red circle on File:AD FOR COON CARDS? Didn't want to revert it without discussing it with you. Festucalextalk 07:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Festucalex Very nice of you to communicate. I'm not at all attached. I added the circle because it seemed really hard to "see/notice" without the circle. People are just cruising by. Use your best judgment. Whatever works best for the page. Cheers. jengod (talk) 12:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I went ahead and reverted it, my logic being that anyone could modify it and upload that separately. Let the original be the original. Festucalextalk 12:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Festucalex cool. Cheers. jengod (talk) 12:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Ascher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indigenous.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Water resource subbasins

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Water resource subbasins indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

U.S. embassy articles

edit

Hello Jengod, someone requested to delete a few newly created articles of U.S. embassy in major countries. If you think they should be kept, would you please go to below pages to comment?

Thansk, LightningNThunder (talk) 04:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rainwater harvesting in the Sahel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:California water resource region subwatershed map 12-digit HUC hydrologic unit codes.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:California water resource region subwatershed map 12-digit HUC hydrologic unit codes.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:California water resource region watershed map 10-digit HUC hydrologic unit codes.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:California water resource region watershed map 10-digit HUC hydrologic unit codes.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Rudolf Erren

edit

As there is no record of him shooting down five or more enemy aircraft, he is not an ace. This can be verified at https://www.theaerodrome.com/aces/by_name.php?pageNum_names=1&totalRows_names=33&KT_az=E. Nor is he listed in print in Above the Lines, where he would be expected to appear on pages 103 or 104.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you Georgejdorner! I imagine he had an interesting military career but I think "flying ace" was a latter-day short-hand for "flew a plane during WWI." Very much appreciate the research help! jengod (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, the term is often used loosely. I have followed the strict definition.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your recent creation and expansion of articles related to human reproduction. ★Trekker (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Aww thanks @StarTrekker -- this is my first-ever barnstar! It means a lot. Best, jengod (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I am shocked to heard that! You've been a diligent editor for many years. Thanks again for your great work.★Trekker (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Karl Krüger

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Karl Krüger, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Talk page

edit

Like I asked you in Talk:List of large carnivores known to prey on humans, may you please create a Talk page and add their associate WikiProjects, this is an important process, so please make it easier for others, like myself, to assess the articles you started. Many of those articles lack Talk pages, this is not good because others can't always create a Talk page for you. Dancing Dollar (let's talk) 05:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dancing Dollar (1) "others can't always create a Talk page for you" - any user can create a talk page for any article. - Do you mean they shouldn't have to? Possibly, but we all lean into our strengths here and pitch in where we can. People who function differently than you may yet have valuable contributions.
(2) Are you perchance a sock puppet of the user who created Lion attacks? If yes I wish you the best of luck with your Wikipedia:Clean start but also please refrain from commenting on my user talk page again. I do not wish to communicate with you. jengod (talk) 05:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of Greenbrier County, West Virginia

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:History of Greenbrier County, West Virginia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feather Hill Zoo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Holmes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:History of West Virginia by county

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:History of West Virginia by county indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:43, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of slavery in Alabama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbour County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rainwater harvesting in the Sahel

edit

On 9 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rainwater harvesting in the Sahel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that zaï planting pits are an indigenous form of rainwater harvesting in the Sahel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rainwater harvesting in the Sahel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rainwater harvesting in the Sahel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

GOCE copy edit of Joe Martin (orangutan)

edit

I'll get started on this shortly. Please let me know if there's anything specific you'd like me to keep an eye out for! Wracking 💬 05:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ranchos of Los Angeles County

edit

On 10 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ranchos of Los Angeles County, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that grantees of ranchos of Los Angeles County submitted hand-drawn maps known as diseños (example pictured) when making their land claims to the U.S. government? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ranchos of Los Angeles County. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ranchos of Los Angeles County), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for this: Ranchos of Los Angeles County on the main page today - your work is awesome! Netherzone (talk) 01:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Awww, it's my pleasure, @Netherzone. Thanks for the positive reinforcement. :) jengod (talk) 02:59, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Came to say the same. Excellent work. Making such a good-looking and informative table is so tedious. BorgQueen (talk) 03:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
@BorgQueen as they say "comments feed the writer" LOL - seriously thanks for coming by and leaving a note, it genuinely means a lot. jengod (talk) 03:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Woonasquatucket River Greenway

edit

Hi Jengod, I saw your edits to Providence and Springfield Railroad. If you're interesting in making an article on the greenway, I'd be happy to take some photos of it as I live locally, though there's a few already on Commons. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Trainsandotherthings omg you're lovely. I do love covering greenways and rail trails (for ex Redondo Beach via Playa del Rey Line --> Culver Boulevard Median Bike Path) altho I am very far away from that one. I'm in the middle of a massive biography project right now (see User:Jengod/Dolly for one of like 10 in a forthcoming series) but if and when I ever finish that I'll see what I can do for Woonasquatucket River Greenway and summon you for photos 😝 Cheers jengod (talk) 17:57, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Chicano Liberation Front

edit

On 22 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chicano Liberation Front, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Chicano Liberation Front claimed responsibility for 28 bombings in Los Angeles in 1970 and 1971? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chicano Liberation Front. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chicano Liberation Front), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

edit

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

  • New partner:
    • Perlego
  • Library access tips and tricks
  • Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bibliography of Slavery in the United States

edit

Thanks for affirming various entries I've made recently to the Slavery article's Bibliography. I'm currently working on the Constitution of the United States and Bibliography of the United States Constitution articles, both of which of course relate to the issue of slavery. Along the way, I've come across a slew of books and journal articles on the subject and will be adding these to the bibliography when time allows. Any and all feedback would be appreciated. Allreet (talk) 19:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Allreet my only thoughts are take a look at Bibliography of the American Civil War and/or that somewhere down the line we might just want Bibliography of slavery in the United States. I'm absolutely not trained in this domain but I do see a lot of room for improvement in, say, Slave trade in the United States, so I have this on my long-term to-do list. TY for contributing!! jengod (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agree on all counts. I have been using the Civil War's bibliography as a "model" and with that, have also considered a separate bibliography on Slavery. Per your reference, I took a look at the Slave trade article and agree on the need for improvement. That's even more apparent regarding Slavery and the United States Constitution which is essentially a stub. My first impression was to consider nominating the article for deletion, but I believe my reaction was based on the effort a fuller treatment would require, not the subject's notability (huge). Allreet (talk) 16:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes @Allreet I think it's essentially like if the U.S. had a Holocaust but we all agreed to not talk about it for 150 years. It's the most encyclopedic of topics but it's grim stuff and when this place runs on a volunteer basis everyone can just yell "not it" forever. I'm working on some bios of formerly enslaved people right now and I keep having to take breaks bc otherwise I get too emotional about it to function. Anyway, we'll just keep eating the elephant one bite at a time! jengod (talk) 20:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good analogy. And thanks for tackling what you are. I've had only glimpses, but nothing too up close and personal because of the nature of the history I've been buried in. I have noticed a tendency here to downplay slavery and excuse the founders. While that may reflect the work of historians, no doubt some of our contributors are even less objective. So, yes, a bite at a time seems in order. Allreet (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well, here's a daunting project. I did a cursory search and came up with:
Slavery and Slaving in World History: A Bibliography, 1900-1991
The bibliography, by Joseph C. Miller of the University of Virginia, covers over 10,000 books and articles. Then there's this, also connected with UVA:
The Bibliography of Slaving and World Slaving
"...a searchable database containing verified references to approximately 25,000 scholarly works in all academic disciplines and in all western European languages..."
My question is "where does one begin?". One answer would be with articles on the above. As for a bibliography on Slavery in Wikipedia given these resources, your thoughts would be appreciated. Allreet (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Allreet The most important thing is that it's ok if it never gets done, or if it never gets done by you! The world will keep turning. Also the nice thing about Wikipedia is we loooooove rough drafts. My elephant eating advice, if you really want to tackle, is pick five "subtopics" of slavery, like "slave trade," "legislation," "slave narratives," "music," and "material culture." They don't even have to be umbrella categories, just subtopics that maybe interest you personally! Find 3 tolerably good books or resources for each. Then tag {incomplete-list} and hit publish. And don't stress. It might evolve quickly, or slowly, or get nominated for merge or deletion, but eventually, people will cruise by, fix an error, add one thing, and slowly the snowball gains momentum. The fact that you care is the most important factor, so don't loose that to burnout. Slow is smooth and smooth is fast. You're a good conscientious person and I commend you for giving a damn. jengod (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the good advice, essentially that journeys begin with first steps, as well as the encouragement. Which I intend act on along the lines you recommend. Allreet (talk) 15:40, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
The first step: Slavery and Slaving in World History: A Bibliography. Allreet (talk) 19:03, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Chinese Americans in Los Angeles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Chinatown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dolly Johnson

edit

Hi Jengod. I've fixed a couple of the nontarget errors in Dolly Johnson, but there are three still outstanding. The first is "Bowen (2005)", there's a Bowen 2003 but no 2005. Is this a typo? The second is "Knoxville News-Sentinel (1943)". There's no cite for 1943, there is for 1927, 1929, 1930 but no 1943. Lastly is "William A. Johnson obituary, Knoxville Journal (1943)", there is a cite for "Knoxville Journal (1943)" but I wanted to make sure they are the same. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmissions °co-ords° 10:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh @ActivelyDisinterested you are so nice! I edit on mobile so can't see those unless I switch to desktop. I will go fuss around. TY!! jengod (talk) 14:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Never a problem, if you ever have any referencing issues just drop me a message on my talk page. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested transmissions °co-ords° 14:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
ActivelyDisinterested Working on it now and TY again for the inline tags. Super helpful. jengod (talk) 14:56, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hylaeus perkinsianus has been accepted

edit
 
Hylaeus perkinsianus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 14:47, 3 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Gull egg

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Gull egg, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Gull egg

edit

On 14 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gull egg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that seagull eggs (examples pictured) were used as counterfeit plover eggs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gull eggs. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gull egg), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Praise be the Marvin

edit

Praise be the Marv Blepii (talk) 07:08, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mordecai Lincoln

edit

Hello, Thanks for your edit to Mordecai Lincoln. As an FYI, I made an edit so that the couple of sentences before your edit are cited properly here. The NRHP citation covers the content - and I am assuming Rugh does, too.

Otherwise, it looks as if the source for your addition covers those sentences, too. –CaroleHenson (talk) 15:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks @CaroleHenson it was a middle-of-the-night-can't-sleep edit so I need all the help I can get. jengod (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wow, do I understand how that can go! Thanks for contributions!–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dolly Johnson DYK

edit

Hi, Jengod. I hope you're feeling better than you were a few weeks ago. If so, are you up for Template:Did you know nominations/Dolly Johnson to proceed? No hurry, but when you're ready, just add {{subst:DYK?again}} to the nom, signaling that it's ready for somebody to review. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 01:55, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Mandarax you're a wonderful DYK leader. I'm past the flu but now on vacay with family. I will add that template as instructed as soon as I return and will be available to respond to queries and requests. TY!! jengod (talk) 04:20, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Awww, thanks. Glad to hear you're doing better! MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 05:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proper Thanks 🙏

edit

Hello @Jengodjust a real quick thank you for enacting the first edits on my first published Wikipedia article Albert Wyndham Payne. Yay!

I particularly went up another floor in the Wikipedia IQ lift, from ground to 1, when I saw the refinement you had made to the V&A source and re-targeted the ref to the collections page. It gave me so much more reliable information to add to article too. (You know this.) Still, thanks once again.

I was so happy on the day got the green panel of acceptance, I wrote a blog called I, Wikipedian which, with a title change to a more inclusive pronoun, will get published in February on Wyndham’s birthday :-)

I feel like my transmogrification from Wikipedia reader to editor has past a tipping point.

Ooh eck! The floodgates are open! Who knows what will happen next… The Nookster (talk) 19:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Oh wonderful! So glad to see it got approved and welcome @The Nookster jengod (talk) 19:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1836 events in the United States by month

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:1836 events in the United States by month indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Robert Johnson (Tennessee)

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Robert Johnson (Tennessee), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Robert Johnson (Tennessee)

edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Robert Johnson (Tennessee), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply