Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jepp12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Wes Mouse | T@lk 00:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Eurovision Invitation!

edit
 
WikiProject Eurovision invitation for Jepp12!
Hello, I've noticed that you contributed to an article within our project's scope, and would like to formally invite you to join our team of editors at WikiProject Eurovision, a WikiProject dedicated to the Eurovision family of events. If you would like to join, then please add your name to this list and add the project talk page to your watchlist. You may also wish to receive our Project's newsletter; if so then please add your name to the mailing list.

Thanks and have a nice day! Wes Mouse | T@lk 18:44, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2015

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to The X Factor (UK TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Eurovision Song Contest 2015

edit

Please refrain from highlighting 2nd and 3rd places on the article Eurovision Song Contest 2015, like you did in this edit. You actions deviate away from a manual of style that was agreed by WikiProject Eurovision and the information can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision/Format and Guides. You edits have been reverted back to the correct manual of style method. Wes Mouse | T@lk 16:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Ring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Andrews. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:The X Factor series, you may be blocked from editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

The X Factor (UK series 12)

edit

Please can explain why you think WP:COLOUR should not apply to this article? Thanks. AnemoneProjectors 15:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Since you have made the same edit again, I will ask you again. Why do you think WP:COLOUR should not apply to The X Factor (UK series 12)? AnemoneProjectors 16:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Or do you have another suggestion on how to apply WP:COLOUR to the article? AnemoneProjectors 16:30, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
I invite you to comment on the discussion at Talk:The X Factor (UK series 12)#WP:COLOUR. Thanks. AnemoneProjectors 13:16, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Again, please explain why you think WP:COLOUR should not apply to this article? Ignoring it won't make it stop. AnemoneProjectors 15:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

December 2015

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. livelikemusic my talk page! 13:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic my talk page! 13:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MusikAnimal talk 16:15, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm AnemoneProjectors. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The X Factor (UK series 12) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. This is in relation to the above and your refusal to discuss or explain your edits. AnemoneProjectors 14:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 12), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AnemoneProjectors 16:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 12). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  AnemoneProjectors 08:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  AnemoneProjectors 16:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jepp12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

AnemoneProjecters im so sorry that im keep removing Those symboles i promise that i Will never remove those symboles so please unblock me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jepp12 (talkcontribs)

Decline reason:

You were warned multiple times about it. You were blocked multiple times for it. Why didn't you stop any of those times? What will you do differently now if you were unblocked? only (talk) 14:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jepp12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

im so sorry i don't know what's Got in to me but i 100% Promise that i Will never do it again ill use the talk page next time just please unblock me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jepp12 (talkcontribs)

Decline reason:

Given your block history, we need sensible answers to the two questions posed above by Only. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Jepp, I have transcluded your request again properly so other admins can see it. I am reluctant to review your unblock request because I have previously blocked you, therefore I am involved. However, you will probably need to answer the questions asked by Only in order for your unblock request to be considered. Why didn't you stop after the previous warnings?--5 albert square (talk) 12:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay 5 Albert square ill Do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jepp12 (talkcontribs)

What two questions anthony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jepp12 (talkcontribs)

Hi again Jepp12, you will need to file a new unblock request and transclude it properly so other uninvolved admins can see it. In other words, do not just type that you want unblocked, follow the instructions in the blocking notice and place the appropriate template on your talk page. You will also need to sensibly answer the questions posed by Only in order for your unblock request to be considered. The questions asked were why you didn't stop this type of editing after your previous blocks and what you will do differently now if unblocked.--5 albert square (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Alisan Porter performing She's with us.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Alisan Porter performing She's with us.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 10), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I am giving you only one warning because you were asked in December 2015 not to make these edits, and you were blocked in January 2016 because you continued to do so, yet you are making the same edits in August 2016. anemoneprojectors 15:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jepp12 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16420 was submitted on Aug 26, 2016 12:48:56. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Jepp12. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply