Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Regulus (Steamer) (April 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, JeromeOBrien! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 17:52, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SS Regulus has been accepted

edit
 
SS Regulus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 02:42, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earlshall has been accepted

edit
 
Earlshall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ToThAc (talk) 18:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

About your edits

edit

Hi, nice job on the Earlshall article. A thing I've noticed is that you tend to make smaller edits which clog page histories; that's not really a bad thing, it's just inconvenient for most users. In the future, please try to make your changes in one large edit, or use the "This is a minor edit" checkbox above the "Save page" button if you can't avoid it. Thanks! ToThAc (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for your advice and help I am new to this but I am absolutely loving it. I will not edit so often in the future and will use minor edit if I must. I have a question. If a location is now known by another name how would I reference that? For example in 1910 it was 'Leeward Cove' but today it's known as 'Lower Cove'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeromeOBrien (talkcontribs)

You could try expressing it as "Leeward Cove (now known as Lower Cove)". ToThAc (talk) 21:30, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply