December 2022

edit

  Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Talk:United Nations Human Rights Council can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 23:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Demands to "ban" people with whom you disagree are generally looked upon with disfavor. Stop attacking other editors. Acroterion (talk) 23:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 23:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

For what he reverted my edits without discussion and you are punishing me. You are favoring him.JerusalemisthecapitalofIsrael (talk)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JerusalemisthecapitalofIsrael (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked becuase another editor was reverting me edits without discussion,. An admin showed bias siding with the offender. 

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. EvergreenFir (talk) 02:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You also need to reconsider your username, which appears to be a deliberate attempt to provoke. If you encountered "Jerusalemisthecapitalofpalestine," what would you think of the intentions for that editor? Acroterion (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


How? I say it with pride as a Zionist. MLK was a Zionist too.JerusalemisthecapitalofIsrael (talk) 07:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion?

edit

This appears to be admission of such [1] O3000, Ret. (talk) 14:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

The IP is blocked now. It appears to have been a platform for soapboxing for some time, and now they're branching out into personal attacks. I'm extending the block on this user to an indefinite WP:NOTHERE block, based on the IP's history and their insistence on abusing WIkipedia as a platform for polemics. To be unblocked, the editor will have to provide convincing assurance that they will stop the knee-jerk attacks on others, particularly the accusations of religious bias they keep making against other editors, and that they will stop using talkpages as platforms for aggressive polemics. The username will have to be changed too, as it's clear that it's part of the persona they wish to project here at the encyclopedia. Acroterion (talk) 15:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
And I've removed talkpage access to the IP for continued personal attacks. Acroterion (talk) 19:29, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply