Jgreager4
| This user is a student editor in College_of_DuPage/Research,_Writing,_and_the_Production_of_Knowledge_(Summer_2022) . |
Welcome
editHello, Jgreager4 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Nythar (talk) 02:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
editHello, Jgreager4, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:08, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add highly promotional content referenced to the company's own website. Do not use social media sites like LinkedIn as references. Please read the Neutral Pont of view, which is a core content policy. Cullen328 (talk) 22:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- You added a sentence "The vision for LS3 is to combine the capabilities of a pack mule with the intelligence of a trained animal." A pack mule is an intelligent trained animal. "Vision" in this context is promotional labguage. You need to do better with your writing. Cullen328 (talk) 22:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- okay I'll change it, also were you the one who rolled back my edits? I'm doing a school project and I don't see why you rolled back all the stuff I added? I don't think it seemed "promotional" just because I got a majority of it off of their website. I can easily rewrite it but I don't see how it's fair to keep information taken from the companies Linkedin, but not articles found within their website that were written with accurate information? I understand fixing writing mistakes but I'm put at a loss now. Jgreager4 (talk) 23:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Remove all references to LinkedIn and other social media websites. They are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia except in very limited circumstances. An acceptable Wikipedia article about a company summarizes what reliable sources that are entirely independent of the company say about the company. Articles about companies are not supposed to be promotional brochures. They are supposed to be neutral. Yes, I removed all that marketing language you wrote.
Boasting the title as the worlds most compact mobile hydraulic system
is overt marketing language. You are writing about the LS3 using a ten year old source as if it is current. The LS3 was canceled in 2015. You need to step up your game. Cullen328 (talk) 23:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)- okay I understand what you mean, but cant I use the listed specs of the robots that are given right on the front page? Some of the stuff you deemed "Marketing Language" was just taken right from the features list. I get getting rid of the accomplishments of the bots and using info from other sources, but I feel that no other source can explain a bots function better than the very people who made them. Also you need to do better with your rollbacks. My Handle info was completely separate from the Boston Dynamics website or socials. Jgreager4 (talk) 00:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- No, you cannot take the "features list" from the company website. The very idea of a "features list" is a promotional concept. You need to summarize what independent robotics journals and business publications say about this company and their products. If people want to read what the company says about itself and its products, they can go to the company website. That is not the purpose of this encyclopedia. Cullen328 (talk) 00:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- As for your edit about the Handle robot, it included
The end goal of this redesign was to entice warehouse owners to invest in this new robot.
That is very far from encyclopedic language. It is marketing language. Cullen328 (talk) 00:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- As for your edit about the Handle robot, it included
- No, you cannot take the "features list" from the company website. The very idea of a "features list" is a promotional concept. You need to summarize what independent robotics journals and business publications say about this company and their products. If people want to read what the company says about itself and its products, they can go to the company website. That is not the purpose of this encyclopedia. Cullen328 (talk) 00:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- okay I understand what you mean, but cant I use the listed specs of the robots that are given right on the front page? Some of the stuff you deemed "Marketing Language" was just taken right from the features list. I get getting rid of the accomplishments of the bots and using info from other sources, but I feel that no other source can explain a bots function better than the very people who made them. Also you need to do better with your rollbacks. My Handle info was completely separate from the Boston Dynamics website or socials. Jgreager4 (talk) 00:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- Remove all references to LinkedIn and other social media websites. They are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia except in very limited circumstances. An acceptable Wikipedia article about a company summarizes what reliable sources that are entirely independent of the company say about the company. Articles about companies are not supposed to be promotional brochures. They are supposed to be neutral. Yes, I removed all that marketing language you wrote.
- okay I'll change it, also were you the one who rolled back my edits? I'm doing a school project and I don't see why you rolled back all the stuff I added? I don't think it seemed "promotional" just because I got a majority of it off of their website. I can easily rewrite it but I don't see how it's fair to keep information taken from the companies Linkedin, but not articles found within their website that were written with accurate information? I understand fixing writing mistakes but I'm put at a loss now. Jgreager4 (talk) 23:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)