Welcome

edit

Hi, Jiddins. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 11:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spring Creek Lodge Academy. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 11:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spring Creek Lodge Academy. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. —James (TalkContribs) • 1:15pm 03:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spring Creek Lodge Academy. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. —James (TalkContribs) • 10:49am 00:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Articles for creation/Spring Creek Lodge Academy

edit

Hi. You made an Article for creation page, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spring Creek Lodge Academy (2011-11-27), but it was never actually submitted for a review.

I have submitted it just now, so you should get feedback soon. Cheers!  Chzz  ►  23:54, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 22:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Westchester Township

edit

Greetings! You recently added some material to the article for Westchester Township, Porter County, Indiana. I initially reverted it because it seemed to be copied directly from a web page (http://wpl.lib.in.us/museum/A-Brief-History-of-Westchester-Township.html). I see that you have added it again with citations and a "used with permission" claim; however, this doesn't really change anything. The article still consists largely of material copied directly and word-for-word from a website, written by someone else, yet it's not presented that way. Please see Wikipedia:Quotations. Article should be written by Wikipedia editors, using cited sources to support the text, not comprise the text. Any thoughts? Omnedon (talk) 16:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The material under the history section was taken from a document that is provided free to the public. It is copyright-free and was intended to be used on wikipedia and other sites local sites that provide free information to residents. I am editing this article on behalf of the museum to make the summary historical knowledge available to a wider audience.

First and foremost, thank you for your efforts. Expanding articles like this is a worthy effort. However, aside from any other issues, you would need to show that the material you are adding is copyright-free, rather than simply claim it, especially since the source web page clearly states "© Copyright 2009 Westchester Public Library" at the bottom. We are not supposed to copy the contents of entire web pages into articles; this is about more than just the copyright issue (which still stands, in my opinion). Omnedon (talk) 18:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
With this edit, you state that the material you have added is in the public domain; yet the source webpage states a copyright at the bottom. How do you reconcile that? If I can be of any assistance with any of this, please let me know; I am not here to prevent you from improving this article -- quite the reverse, and I applaud your efforts -- but there is a significant Wikipedia policy involved with this particular material. Omnedon (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Not to belabor the point here, but one suggestion: summarize the township's history in your own words, citing reliable sources. The link directly to the summary at the Westchester Public Library website could be provide in the "External links" section, so that it would be easily available to anyone looking at the article -- but it wouldn't be copied word-for-word in the article itself. That would be the preferable way to build the history section, for various reasons. Any thoughts? Omnedon (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cut - n - paste

edit

Please don't remove content from an article and then paste that content into a new article without giving credit, that is "saying where it came from", as you recently did on Valparaiso Moraine / Mississinawa Moraine. Your edit summary from the new article, "pasted material from other article to form new article" was not adequate, please give credit by at least stating what "other article". Without proper attribution your "new article" is essentially a copyright violation. Please rectify that with an explanation on the talk pages of the articles concerned. Vsmith (talk) 17:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

See: Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Vsmith (talk) 17:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I see you have now made cut n paste copies of two other articles: Fort Wayne Moraine and Union Moraine. Please address the copyright concerns for these also. Vsmith (talk) 18:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


All articles should be licensed under the creative commons license. I have placed an editor's note on the two articles anyway.Jiddins (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Yes they are under that license, however according to the policy page linked above, we need to give credit for content copied within WP. The proper place for your "editor's note"s is on the article talk pages. Please move them there and provide time details along with your sig. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will do this. Thanks for the pointer.Jiddins (talk) 19:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

You are welcome, I've added categories to the new moraine stubs. Now they just need expanding. Cheers, Vsmith (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. When you recently edited Great Lakes Basin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watersheds (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Calumet Region, IN concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Calumet Region, IN, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Calumet Region, IN

edit
 

Hello Jiddins. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Calumet Region, IN".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Calumet Region, IN}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply