Jirgen666
Hi Jirgen666,
Thank you very much for your report at WP:AIV. However, the vandalism noticeboard is not intended for this purpose, since the reported edits have not been done in bad faith, and are thus not "vandalism".
Please have a look at WP:Dispute resolution, a detailed explanation for dealing with disputes on Wikipedia. Please note that one of the recommended options is disengaging from the dispute. In my personal opinion, this is always the best option.
Thank you very much in advance and best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Notice March
editUTRS 30002
edit
Jirgen666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #30002 was submitted on 2020-04-11 05:32:08. This review is now closed.
--Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 07:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 07:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)- My edits have already been vindicated by more qualified administrators who are more knowledgeable and professional at the academic topic at hand. No need to un-ban me, my work is done here.
- If that was really the case and you weren't just stroking your ego, there wouldn't have been a need for you to post.
- At this point, this talk page is for you to try to understand your block, appeal your block, and nothing further. If your next post is anything but understanding or appealing your block (not arguing it but admitting to the behavior and showing how you'll avoid it in the future), your talk page access will be revoked. We don't have time for your petty attempts at mind games. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:59, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- My edits have already been vindicated by more qualified administrators who are more knowledgeable and professional at the academic topic at hand. No need to un-ban me, my work is done here.