May 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Mattythewhite that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:19, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you'd mind not harassing me on my talk page it would be much appreciated. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ernesto Valverde, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ernesto Valverde. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ernesto Valverde. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:10, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jjgonzalezp2006 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The edits I made are right. Fuck the admins Jjgonzalezp2006 (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You're not blocked, but if you keep up this disruption, that certainly can and will change. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jjgonzalezp2006 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18404 was submitted on May 31, 2017 17:19:46. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jjgonzalezp2006 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18405 was submitted on May 31, 2017 18:02:37. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 18:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jjgonzalezp2006 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18434 was submitted on Jun 04, 2017 16:42:27. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jjgonzalezp2006 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18440 was submitted on Jun 05, 2017 14:00:58. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply