Jjscone

Hi JJ:

This is meant as friendly advice about the examples you added in the Hypocrisy article.

The way Wikipedia works, I'm pretty sure they will get deleted by somebody. The first part of an article is meant to be a brief introduction to the topic. Not the right place to get into examples.

If the examples were moved somewhere else in the article, they might stay.

Best wishes, Wanderer57 01:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some links that may be helpful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars

"Neutral Point of View": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ (official policy)

"Verifiability": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability (official policy)

"No Original Research": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research) (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not (official policy)

Happy editing!

Yours, Famspear 19:08, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Wrist cutting music

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Wrist cutting music, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ViperSnake151 21:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Parasitism (social offense). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Parasitism (social offense), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This is an objective article on historical and factual accounts of social parasitism. It is not the place for original research, nor for you to express your views on landlords and real estate developers. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)