User talk:Jmunroo/Archive 1

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Microchip08 in topic Chill!
Archive 1

April 2008

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Prostate, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ► RATEL ◄ 00:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Prostatic stent

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prostatic stent, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ► RATEL ◄ 00:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ratel, you will be blocked from editing. You are editing pages and at the same time removing links and other key information. Stop immediately. ► RATEL ◄ 09:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention needs to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well intended, or outright vandalism. Jmunroo (talk) 11:14, 24 April 2008 (UTC) Think the reference data must have been lost on two of the refs - they were my refs anyway. I should add back in. Ratel - please note:

  1. Be polite
  2. Assume good faith
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Be welcoming

Jmunroo (talk) 12:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The data you removed from my talk page and from the Prostate page were not "your" refs. I suggest you go back and look at the diffs of your edits. You are removing data outside the area you edit, making images disappear and citations no longer work. It smells of vandalism to me. ► RATEL ◄ 15:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Ratel - isnt the talk area for friendly discussions? It seems to me you are biting. WP:DONTBITE Jmunroo (talk) 15:59, 24 April 2008 (UTC) "It smells of vandalism to me" doesn't seem like "assuming good faith" to me either.

I've never seen anyone else do what you have done and still be a good faith editor. Either you simply are clueless, or you are indulging in sneaky vandalism. Either way, it's unwelcome. Learn how to edit pages properly if you are clueless. For instance, your current page on stents has a ref section that mostly is full of dead links. More sneaky vandalism? ► RATEL ◄ 00:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Ratel - please stop harrasing me.  . Try constructive criticism, rather than threats, abuse and name calling. Your comments add nothing to the community. PS - "ref section that mostly is full of dead links." Actually 3 out of 10 references were dead - only because firefox didn't copy the numbers across. By the way 3/10 is not "mostly". Those links have been updated. I strongly request that you stop the personal attacks and leave me alone - looking at your archives you have a history of inaccurate and aggressive behavior towards fellow editors. Again, please be be cool and civil.

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Ratel, you will be blocked from editing. In this diff you vandalized my image again. Time to report you methinks. ► RATEL ◄ 13:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Abuse of twinkle tool

You abused the Twinkle tool to issue me a final warning for "personal attacks" because I had given you a final warning for repeated vandalism of my page, which you have in fact done. At no stage have you apologized for the vandalism. At no stage have you tried to explain the fact that you are deliberately changing links and image names to break the functionality of pages on this encyclopedia. Do you have any excuse to offer for this behavior, before I report you? ► RATEL ◄ 16:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Chill!


Welcome!

Hello, Jmunroo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Microchip 08 17:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your help! Means a lot. Jmunroo (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Archive 1