Jmvuocolo

Jmvuocolo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jmvuocolo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jmvuocolo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jmvuocolo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Theroadislong, What can I provide you to proove that this is not a conflict of interest? Jmvuocolo (talk) 20:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Griffin (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Griffin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mary Griffin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mary Griffin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:54, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mary Griffin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mary Griffin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mary Griffin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mary Griffin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Please tell me what are the "inappropriate" links? Jmvuocolo (talk) 19:08, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

These [1], [2], [3] and [4] which are in the body of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Theroadislong, I changed footnote 2 and 3 so they now refer to NYTImes articles. I removed footnote 4 that you deemed inappropriate. Would you please tell me whey Grantsmakers for the Arts in footnote 1 is not considered appropriate? Thank you. Jmvuocolo (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mary Griffin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mary Griffin. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Dear Robert McClenon, Thank you for your note about Mary Griffin disambiguation. What am I to do next? Do I copy the info from the original article that I created to the disambiguation link that you sent? Or do I wait to hear from Theroadislong to see if there are more edits I need to make? Am I correct to assume that Mary Griffin has met Wiki notability and sourcing requirements? Or should I be writing an editor asking for help? Are you and Theroadislong editors? As you can see I am learning. Appreciate whatever help you offer me. Jmvuocolo (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Griffin (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Griffin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 04:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Griffin

Hello, Jmvuocolo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Griffin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)