Wikipedia

User talk:Joe Decker/Archive 26

< User talk:Joe Decker
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Joe Decker in topic Deletion review for Lithuania national beach soccer team
Archive 20←Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28→Archive 30

New Section_ Franklin Loufrani page was deleted

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Hi!

I had created the French version of the Franklin Loufrani page (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Loufrani) however it was deleted immediately.

And also it takes me to a discussion page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Franklin_Loufrani/Suppression

The reason it displays here is "The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work."

However this page is the faithful translation of the English page so I am not sure why this will include copyright issues while the English page don't.

Can you look into this and shed some light on how I can create this page please?

Thanks!

86.188.131.18 (talk) 12:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
I'm not specifically familiar with policies on fr.wikipedia, but as I read the discussion that you've linked, I see that an article on Loufrani has been deleted twice, once in 2011 and once in 2015, and the discussion involving copyright was in regard to the 2011 article. So it may be that the actual reason for deletion in 2015 has nothing to do with copyright.
The 2015 deletion was performed by an administrator of the French wikipedia named @Litlok:, I would ask him or her for further information on their rationale for deletion, and if there is a path for appeal. Litlok's talk page is at
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_utilisateur:Litlok
Hope this helps, and best of luck! --joe deckertalk 14:56, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
As nobody wrote to me on my talk page on frwiki, I will answer here...
The page was deleted following the conclusions of the debate of 2011: the article was nothing more than a CV, and no reliable source could be found, focused on the subject of the article. The notability of the smiley itself is far greater than that of its creator. Litlok (talk) 00:23, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Ricky Garcia (actor)

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello! Thanks for deleting Ricky Garcia (actor) at AfD! I have but one more request – could you send me (E-mail or Talk page is fine) the last version of the article before deletion? I would like to merge in that version to the present contents at Draft:Ricky Garcia. Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:56, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Be glad to!   Done --joe deckertalk 20:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks again!! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 23:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

I Drink Your Blood Reply

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So I just replied to yours and Huon's comments on the Help Me tag I added for I Drink Your Blood. Just wanted to let you know.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Request on 13:27:50, 17 December 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Revenant1964

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion


I would like to know what copyright law was infringed upon;the link that you included and from which you claim material has been taken has no reference to Erik M. Vogt. Please explain - thank you!


Revenant1964 (talk) 13:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Well, I screwed that up. I've reverted the notice and the article should be looked at by another reviewer shortly. My apologies for the error. --joe deckertalk 16:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 
 
 

Hello Joe Decker: Enjoy the holiday season and upcoming winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 18:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

 
Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

SmartFocus - request for un-deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

i believe you deleted the page 'SmartFocus', however the article is in fact notable, and if you could un-delete it i will be sure to provide more reliable resources /citations as, after previous discussions, i'm sure this was what was said as to why it may get deleted.

Please let me know ASAP how we can move forward with this.

thanks

Emvfr (talk) 10:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, it'll have to be the other way around. I deleted the article in question based on the consensus I found in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SmartFocus, and won't be able to override that decision without first seeing overwhelming evidence that the article meets the specific requirements of WP:CORP, including WP:CORPDEPTH.
So, the next step would be for you to show me significant in-depth coverage published by editorially sound sources, completely independently from the company (interviews, press releases and the sort of lightly warmed over press releases often printed in business rags need not apply). Thanks! --joe deckertalk 16:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #189

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikidata weekly summary #186

 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.


Season's greetings!

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 
 
 

Hello Joe Decker: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Esquivalience t 21:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

 
Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Restore the Una Tribe of Mixed-Bloods page

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

In 2014, you deleted the article Una Tribe of Mixed-Bloods because people called it a "hoax" and said it was not sourced enough. However, since 2014, the tribe has amassed a total enrollment of more than 1,200 enrolled members. They have also made US history this year by signing two treaties with tribes in Canada and one with a state recognized Cherokee tribe in Georgia. They have also been featured on the news FOUR times now. They have also, in a news interview with KVAL, Mayor Kitty Piercy of Eugene, Oregon gave her full support for the tribes recognition. In the same interview you can see the letter of support she wrote for the tribes recognition. Their Senate President is Hafeezah Comeaux, an acclaimed author (google her).

From all of the evidence and SOURCES, this tribe is not a hoax, and the page should be restored. Here are some SOURCES for the tribes existence (international news article, TV interviews, Mayoral recognition and support, and the bill to recognize them in the State of Oregon, which was in committee in 2015 in the Oregon House of Representatives):

The tribe is definitely NOT a hoax, and has enrollment nearing 1,300. The tribe was grossly defamed and their Wikipedia page was wrongly attacked. Clearly the tribe has international presence and has been rising in profile. I believe this tribe should be on Wikipedia due to their ever growing profile and enrollment. The page should be restored. The one I just posted yesterday Una Nation of Mixed-Bloods was deleted due to the original article being deleted. Please restore it. Thank you. Greatspiritlove (talk) 04:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

My apologies for the delay in responding. I've restored the article to Draft:Una Tribe of Mixed-Bloods
Some of the sources you've provided are clearly newer than the discussion I closed in October, so recreation is allowed. This does nothing to prevent there being another discussion, and it's not clear to me, based on my long experience at deletion discussions, what the community would decide based on the new sources.
My recommendation is that you add the best sources here if they're not already in places (the text articles will probably get more weight in your favor, interviews will tend to be seen as less "independent" than arms-length reporting pieces, etc.), and that you get feedback from another editor using our "Articles for Creation" process before having the article is restored. This is not required, but it is my recommendation, and I think provides the greatest chance that the resulting article will survive any future deletion discussion.
When you've made any further changes you'd like, simply add 
{{subst:submit}}
to the article.
Note that I've temporarily commented out the categories for the article, that will be corrected automatically if your draft is accepted.
I wish you the best, --joe deckertalk 04:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
  The 78.26 RFA Appreciation award
Thank you for the participation and support at my RFA. It is truly appreciated. I hope to be of further help around here, and if you see me doing something dumb, you know where to find me. Again, I thank you. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I have absolutely no doubt you'll be of great help. Just remember to never delete the main page. ;-) Congrats again! --joe deckertalk 04:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Merry

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Joe - I was perusing your photographs today and was reminded of how insanely talented you are behind the lens! We don't run into each other as often these days, but I wanted to make sure to reach out and wish you the happiest of holidays. Cheers, --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 17:20, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Thank you so much (I leave for Antarctica next week, w00hoo!). And a merry holiday season to you! It has been way too long! If you ever make it out my way, make sure to let me know, there's a beverage-of-your-choice with your name on it just waiting for ya! --joe deckertalk 21:59, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Wishing you all the best . . .

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Merry Christmas, Joe, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 06:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Thanks, @Dirtlawyer!:, and a Merry Christmas to you! --joe deckertalk 22:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15c}} to your friends' talk pages.

Thanks, @WereSpielChequers:, it's been way too long, I hope things are well! Happy holidays to you! --joe deckertalk 22:01, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Cantal is a department ruled by a prefect and with a prefecture or capital , its number is 15.

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi ! Could you help me translate this , please ?

Thanks. Lookinland (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

France is divided in departments , each of them is ruled by a prefect nominated by the president of the republic and has a capital or prefecture.

Cantal is a department ruled by a prefect and with a prefecture or capital , its number is 15.

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi ! Could you help me translate this , please ?

Thanks. Lookinland (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

France is divided in departments , each of them is ruled by a prefect nominated by the president of the republic and has a capital or prefecture.

@Lookinland:, I'm sorry, I don't speak French. --joe deckertalk 22:05, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #190

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikidata weekly summary #186

 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Nobel Oil Group page - removal of reliable sources, edit warring

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Since you have had interest in the page Nobel Oil Group and edited it before, could you take a look at it? Two potential sock-puppets have been messing with the page, removing reliable sources, removing any criticism and controversy surrounding the company, removing information about the owner of the company, etc. See here [1] and here [2]. Judging from the coordination of multiple IPs they will engage in edit-warring. Multiple such potentially paid users who have created or edited this very page have previously been banned as sock-puppets (e.g., User:Factsforus and User:Feelingfancyfree). This whole page smells like a PR campaign for the company. Thank you. Redzed9876 (talk) 15:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

By the way, in support of my previous words, please note that one of the IPs editing the page are employees of Nobel Oil Group - the very company they edit the page of - see proof: [3] This IP belongs to Nobel Oil, and was used at least twice today to edit the page: [4] Redzed9876 (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Joe Decker!

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 
 
Happy New Year!

Joe Decker,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 20:43, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Thanks! --joe deckertalk 19:55, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

from Martine N

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for your comments on my page :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:UK_Shaolin_Temple

I have made the adjustments

Happy New Year hope your enjoyed your antarctic adventure!!!

Thanks! --joe deckertalk 19:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Anatoly Moskvin

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Joe Decker, I recently created a page for the Russian Historian, Linguist and grave robber Anatoly Moskvin, as I was surprised to find that he lacked one. Today I made my page live and have only now discovered that a page did once exist for Moskvin, but it was subsequently deleted.

I was notified on the talk page that you were the deleting administrator and that, as I have created a page similar to the one deleted, I should contact you. I understand that the original page was deleted on various grounds, but I feel that my page which is far more comprehensive and extensive than the original, addresses these issues. Your advice and guidance would be appreciated. I hope you're having a nice day.

12:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Talfuin (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Talfuin, thanks for the note!
I originally deleted the article as a result of the discussion at Anatoly Moskvin. A key issue for the article in that discussion was how it fared under our WP:BLP1E article. In general, we avoid having articles on people famous for one thing only, who would not have otherwise been famous. WP:PERP also provides an interpretation of this with respect to people accused of criminal behavior.
You've done some work which addresses this objection in part. It is extremely helpful that you've provided some bibliographic information, from that I was able, for example, to locate his books and his listing at Worldcat [5].
Because you've provided new evidence that relates to the reason I deleted it, there are no automatic grounds for deleting it again.
As a result, for the article to be deleted again it would have to go through another community discussion similar to the previous one I linked above, and it's hard to say whether another editor will or won't start one. If they do, it is difficult for me to be sure whether it would survive. How WP:BLP1E is interpreted by the community is often a balance of several factors.
In part, that the crimes are relatively well-covered not only in news accounts but in at least one book pushes the argument towards the article surviving.
However, the lack so far of coverage of him in unrelated subjects -- coverage such as reviews of his dictionaries, etc., would argue that we'd never have an article on him were it not for the crime.
In short, the article can stay for now, but if it is nominated for deletion I think there is a fair chance it will be deleted, but some chance it won't. You can tip those odds if you can find editorial coverage (or if I've missed some in the article--certainly possible) that covers Moskvin in any other context outside of his grave crimes. That is, in my estimation, the only serious issue, you've clearly done enormous work toward improving the article, and no matter any eventual outcome, thank you for your contributions working to improve the encyclopedia. Do let me know if I can elaborate on any of the points here. --joe deckertalk 16:05, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Joe Decker, thank you for very much for such a swift and informative response. I appreciate you taking the time to explain the situation, I now have a much better understanding. And thank you for your kind words, I hope you have a nice day. Talfuin (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Karla Lane

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Just letting you know that I am in the process of re-creating this article. I have no idea how it looked when you deleted it back in 2014, but now she was won the AVN award for BBW Performer of the Year. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 08:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the note! --joe deckertalk 02:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Gary Wales

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Gary Wales Actor was deleted how come?

www.GaryWales.co.uk

As a result of the community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gary_Wales_(actor). There are two primary issues given by the participants in the discussion, both of which argue for deletion. One was that the subject doesn't meet our NACTOR and BASIC requirements, which usually boil down to significant amounts of signficant newspaper/magazine/etc. coverage of the subject in practice. The other issue had to do with the promotionally of the article, it's generally impossible to write a neutral encyclopedia article about yourself or your enterprise, WP:PSCOI has some advice should you wish to try again, but in any case, any successful attempt to recreate the article would be based on the sorts of coverage I describe. --joe deckertalk 02:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your bot

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Joe,
I had a question about your bot. I regularly check the database report list of empty categories and tag most of them with a CSD C1 tag unless I know there is a question about how the category was emptied or if the category is the subject of discussion. But I prefer to tag the categories and have another admin do the deletion if the category is still empty after four days.
But I occasionally check my CSD log and look at pages that I've tagged for deletion and look at the ones that weren't deleted to see if I tagged them incorrectly. Usually what occurs is that a category is temporarily empty and then no longer is so I remove the CSD tag. But recently, I've noticed that there are empty categories, sitting in Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion that are not moved over to Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as empty categories after four days. I just checked on some empty categories I tagged on Jan. 16 and Jan. 17 that were still in the first category so I deleted them. But I'm only checking on categories that I've tagged, there might be other, older categories that have been sitting in the Empty categories awaiting deletion that need to be moved.
So, I'm just checking to see if the bot is performing its task still or if some code needs tweaking. It's just a little problem but if you could you look into it, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 20:39, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Liz:, I've been away, but will attempt to look into this tomorrow. Quite possible that something got derailed while I was away, the machine is on, but ... --joe deckertalk 02:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
@Liz:: It's possible that my machine was down or otherwise confused during my absence, I'm running it now and it appears to be (finally!) populating the deletion category. Sorry fro the fuss. I really need to transition that code to labs sometime, but I've never gone through all the fuss to get set up there. --joe deckertalk 16:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Creative Mobile

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You indef protected Creative Mobile with a note about "Gaming of Wikipedia policy by an employee there. Creation of a policy-compliant article okay, but not before." There is another article Creative Mobile (Estonia) which should be at the title Creative Mobile, as there are no other articles of that name. I just wanted to check this wasn't related to the page protected/deleted. Thx. Tassedethe (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

@Tassedethe: I don't think that's the same company, it's been over a year so I've forgotten the specifics. I've unprotected it, and I support your suggested move. --joe deckertalk 18:28, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:09, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Brianhe RfA Appreciation award
Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 07:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Removed vandalism from your page

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, your user talk page was vandalized earlier today. I took care of it and will continue to monitor the guy who 'masterminded' the move. So yeah, sorry for all the notifications on here.—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 00:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

It's all cool.  :) Thanks for your efforts, and no apologies necessary! --joe deckertalk 00:31, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Mobcrush

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. I left a comment on the Draft talk:Mobcrush page about your decline and would appreciate your replied there. Thanks Thirtythree (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

  Done, thanks for the note. --joe deckertalk 17:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Publish Draft: Una Tribe of Mixed-Bloods

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Joe, clearly there are new sources that establish credibility to this tribe and its people. As sourced, the tribe is now officially recognized by the Mayor of Springfield, Oregon, Christine Lundberg, as well as given full support for recognition by the Mayor of Eugene, Oregon, Kitty Piercy. Here is the link: [Una Tribe of Mixed-Bloods]. Also, their name has changed to the Una Nation of Mixed-Bloods, as sourced. Please publish the page with their correct name. The tribe has made US history by becoming the first Mixed-Blood tribe in the United States to be recognized, as well as signing two treaties with tribes in Canada, as sourced. The haters are out there, but this tribe is legit and real. They are rising with almost 1,400 enrolled members. Also, on Thursday the 25th, the Prince and Co-Founder of the tribe will be interviewed by the United Nations. More info and sources to be added this week. Thank you so much! Mixedbloodadvocate (talk) 07:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Joe, the "sources" were the same as before, just misrepresented. The "new sources" were twitter and facebook pages. The re-creator was a block-evading sockpuppeteer. I have re-deleted and salted. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 16:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry I missed this, CorbieVreccan, thanks for looking into this. --joe deckertalk 20:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Lead

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It has been indicated that I need a lead sentence. I thought that the first sentence acted a lead. Does the lead go in a special place?

I noted the hyperlink for New Rochelle but I am not sure how to add a hyperlink myself19:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Ajacton (talk). There at least two more that I need to insert and some more will be needed for additional text.

Hi, @Ajacton::
I tweaked the lead sentence, what you had originally read more like a few sentence fragments. I'm not sure I would have declined the article for that, it's simple to fix, but we do try for a very simple, accessible style for our encyclopedia articles. Here's more about what we eventually hope for: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section.
For adding the hyperlinks -- are you using the "edit", or the "edit source" option? I'm guessing the standard edit option, in which case Wikipedia:VisualEditor/User_guide#Editing_links may explain it. There's a link icon, which looks like a couple segments of a chain link. If you select a word or phrase, then click that chain link icon, you can type in what you would like to link to -- the editor will even give you suggestions based on what articles already exist. Let me know if I can explain further! --joe deckertalk 19:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Deanconnor/sandbox

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
 

Hello, Joe Decker. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 17:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Not mine. --joe deckertalk 17:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 March

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #199

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Stephen Maitland-Lewis Deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Joe Decker! Fif The page was marked for deletion with reference to the Benjamin Franklin award not having a verifiable link. I replaced the link with a verifiable link and the page was subsequently deleted. Can you please let me know what I did wrong? I'd like to complete the page and reinstate it per guidelines. Thank you. Pokerdealer123 (talk) 20:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)Pokerdealer123

I've gone and looked at the changes, and at least see what you're referring to. I think that it was missed can be traced to four factors. First, the claim of the Franklin award was nowhere in the article. Second, the discussion on the deletion was never notified you'd added a source. Third, the source you provided doesn't mention the author. Certainly the last person to comment on the discussion, who did so after the link you added, still believed your claim to be a hoax at the time, and would have been unlikely to have done so if he or she had seen your link.
I'll reopen the discussion for editors to assess the new evidence. --joe deckertalk 21:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Uploading a different picture

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I would like to replace the photo that was added to the bio on a page personally created but that several people have edited. Can you please let me know what the proper steps are. I updated the written portion of page, but now I've been locked out of account on desktop. Periodista1038 (talk) 00:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

There should be information about adding photos at Help:Adding_image. --joe deckertalk 21:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Reverting an edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Joe Decker! I saw that you reverted a pretty much increased wiki-text to a small text with a few sentences. I wan't to ask you why, and if it had any problems. I can fix them. Thanks! (Ibrahim Alizade)

Sure! The primary issue was that the version I reverted from was completely lacking references to sources that allow a reader to see why they should believe that the text is correct. We take the need for this fairly seriously on articles about living people. I don't know if you've run into our way of adding references. The easiest way to start learning how to make references on Wikipedia is to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, which includes a nice video showing how to use the RefToolbar, which makes working with references a whole lot easier. You might take a look through WP:IRS and WP:V for a little background. I don't have any other issues with the text you'd added, and if a few of the most important claims were referenced, I'd have no concerns. Does that help? --joe deckertalk 03:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Mary Ann Steggles

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Joe. There are 8 of us working on our professor's page. You say it is up for deletion. We have now linked the article to other Wikipedia articles and have linked back from at least two. We propose including an entire section on her work on British colonial statues. We are knew and don'[t know all the language but we are trying. Each of the bibliographical references is proof of what has been said in the article. thank you. HoneyabigaleHoneyabigale (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, @Honeyabigale:! First, thank you for your work here. You've more than corrected my concern--we try and very seriously hold a line here against entirely unsourced biographies of living people, and you've added sources to the article. You can also (and should) remove the references to Wikipedia itself, we look for sources with some sort of editorial authority, and "you should believe us at Wikipedia because of this other thing we said" doesn't really give much assurance to readers, but many of your other sources are fine. If you're new to Wikipedia, you may want to ask questions about how to make sense of our complex processes, I often recommend people try the WP:Teahouse to start, they're a great group of editors skilled and helping newer editors navigate the place. Finally, you've mentioned that this is your professor, that's okay, but you will probably want to take a look at WP:PSCOI just to keep on the right side of any conflict-of-interest concerns. Again, welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you'll continue helping us build an encyclopedia. --joe deckertalk 17:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Joe

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Joe. Thank you for your help and comments. We had to go through Ethics approval for this project which is to increase world knowledge Dr. Steggles was our former professor. All of us use Wikipedia. So we decided to add to the knowledge here so we are working on all the British statues sent to India that she researched. We will visit the other sites as it is complicated to get everything right. Thanks Again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honeyabigale (talk • contribs) 00:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

My pleasure! --joe deckertalk 01:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Help with Whirling

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Joe, I've followed you for a while. I'm having trouble with some overzealous editors who nominated whirling for deletion, and then summarily merged it, despite abundant work on this end to stave off the effort. The AfD page is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Whirling, and I've also tried to initiate a convo at Neutral POV because the editors who argued for deletion seem to be practicing very troubling (unacknowledged) forms of Orientalism. I'll be initiating a DRV and was hoping you could help intervene in favor of the original standalone dance articles versus the choppy and incoherent merger that resulted. Thank you. 38.29.152.121 (talk) 01:06, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I'll take a look at the DRV. Thanks for the heads up. --joe deckertalk 21:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Why is the page Nathaniel Hoho up for deletion? Finickin (talk) 00:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

To quote from the large red box at the top of the article: "All biographies of living people created after March 2010 must have at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article." Do you feel that the article was created before March 2010, or do you feel that the article contains references to reliable sources? --joe deckertalk 00:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Sorry if that came off snarkier than I intended. Add a reliable source, and you're welcome to remove the deletion tag from the article. Cheers, --joe deckertalk 00:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Request on 02:29:59, 25 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Brittjohnson73

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion


Just wanted to point out that the content cited that was copyrighted was actually NOT from the page cited. Good job.


Brittjohnson73 (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

"Increased Revenue from the IPS product suite can help fund critical City departments and improve infrastructure" appears in both places. If you'd like to explain that, perhaps I can tell you how to proceed. --joe deckertalk 02:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
More generally?
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a forum for advertising your product, service or other business. If you are writing about your own enterprise, it can be quite difficult to write a proper encyclopedia article--and in fact, our policies go out of their way to suggest that you do not try. Please read and understand WP:PSCOI. However, if you do wish to continue writing such an article, here's some advice.
One of the basic bars an article like this is going to have to meet is notability, which is defined under Wikipedia as being shown by coverage in arm's-length, reliable sources. These are usually things such as newspaper articles and magazine articles, and excludes the sort of "reprinted press releases" common to some local business rags--those sources must be independent and reliable.
My best advice is to start over, and then work at finding those sources. Find out what they talk about, and how. And then write your article based almost entirely on those sources. You can use primary sources to fill in entirely neutral and uncontroversial facts (where's the HQ?), but the use of primary sources should be a minimum.
This process is likely to be frustrating for you if you take any other path. You may also find the folks at the Teahouse (you should have an invite on your talk page) to be a useful resource. Thanks. --joe deckertalk 02:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Disappearance of page for Group Decision Support System

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There used to be a page for Group Decision Support System, but no longer. There was also at least a transient version of "Group-Decision" Support System, but that's gone. There =is= a page for "Decision Support System", but I'm not able to determine if that was what started off (or once was) the page for Group Decision Support System. I saw your name attached to a deletion log reference, and wonder if you know what happened to those pages. Thanks!ClaytonCurtis (talk) 17:57, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

PS: Your "I'm away" message is still active....

I'll look into the away message, that's strange. Thank you for letting me know.
I deleted the article Group-decision support systems, largely because that was consensus of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Group-decision support systems. If you're not familiar with our AfD processes that discussion will be confusing, as there is a lot more unsaid there than said, but largely, to have an article on Wikipedia, the topic needs to have been given signficant coverage in multiple, independent, arm's length reliable sources, a fuller description of this criteria, misleadingly named the "General notability guideline", can be read at WP:GNG.
There were also concerns that the article was written in a style which promotes the subject. More or less, we'd want an article on the subject to largely be a neutral summary of the sorts of things the sources above say about GDSS.
It's quite possible that both issues could be fixed. I think it's quite possible that the needed coverage exists (and glancing around a bit using Google Books and Google Scholar searches, I suspect it does.) If you'd like, I can restore the article to a "draft" if you'd like to try and address those issues. --joe deckertalk 18:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Deleted Page: Stephen Maitland-Lewis

Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

@Joe Decker- Thank you for reopening the discussion for the Stephen Maitland-Lewis page. After the editors agreed to delete based on the PDF not meeting verify requirements, the page was indeed deleted. Please direct me on how to potentially reopen the page without the PDF link and mention. In other words, I can remove the award and PDF link. I'm still learning, so I appreciate any input you may have. Pokerdealer123 (talk) 17:29, 31 March 2016 (UTC)@Pokerdealer123

You're welcome. However, unfortunately, the results of the discussion are clear, the consensus of the community is that the article should not be recreated. You are welcome to appeal my decision (technically, the decision of the other closer) at WP:DRV, however. Best of luck. --joe deckertalk 17:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

@Joe Decker- What options do I have to add a new article on this subject? To clarify, there is in no way the option of reopening the article without the contested award and link? I would like to complete the article so it passes all requirements. Thank you for your help. Pokerdealer123 (talk) 20:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)@Pokerdealer123

The problem isn't the contested award. The problem is the lack of enough else. The consensus of the community is that the article should not be recreated in any form.
Your "options" are going to WP:DRV, or convincing the person who closed the reopened AfD that you have new evidence which invalidates the AfD. I consider both chances quite slim.
You have no other options. I'm sorry that I did not make this more clear. --joe deckertalk 20:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

@Joe Decker- I appreciate your help. Thank you. Pokerdealer123 (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)@Pokerdealer123

You are welcome, sorry that we can be such a maze to navigate. Best of luck, --joe deckertalk 14:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #203

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Do you want one Edit tab, or two? It's your choice

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
How to switch between editing environments
 
Click the [[ ]] to switch to the wikitext editor.
 
Click the pencil icon to switch to the visual editor.

The editing interface will be changed soon. When that happens, editors who currently see two editing tabs – "Edit" and "Edit source" – will start seeing one edit tab instead. The single edit tab has been popular at other Wikipedias. When this is deployed here, you may be offered the opportunity to choose your preferred appearance and behavior the next time you click the Edit button. You will also be able to change your settings in the Editing section of Special:Preferences.

You can choose one or two edit tabs. If you chose one edit tab, then you can switch between the two editing environments by clicking the buttons in the toolbar (shown in the screenshots). See Help:VisualEditor/User guide#Switching between the visual and wikitext editors for more information and screenshots.

There is more information about this interface change at mw:VisualEditor/Single edit tab. If you have questions, suggestions, or problems to report, then please leave a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.

Whatamidoing (WMF) 19:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #204

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Request for purging task

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there any chance you could take on the task of purging Category:Current peer reviews and Category:Requests for peer review with your null bot? This is necessary for Category:Current peer reviews pending closure to successfully populate, which in turn is necessary for an approved bot task of mine (see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/BU_RoBOT_9). I'd appreciate it - didn't even think about purging issues when I submitted that task. ~ RobTalk 15:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #205

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Deletion review for Lithuania national beach soccer team

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

User:TurboGUY has asked for a deletion review of Lithuania national beach soccer team. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 22:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll take a look, I appreciate the notice. I've been dealing with some distractions with family and work. Cheers, --joe deckertalk 19:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Joe_Decker/Archive_26&oldid=1143091226"