JohanPienaar

March 2013

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Jac16888 ^Talk 17:44, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Anton Goosen. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ducknish (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

As it not copyrighted material this is clearly slander from a person hiding behind anonymity. Slander is bad enough, cowardly slander like that of Jac16888 is worse. At no stage did he make any attempt to establish the facts, but merely reverted articles to suit his own needs. Falsely accusing somebody of plagiarism is a personal attackJohanPienaar (talk) 17:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anton Goosen. DVdm (talk) 17:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

The vandalism is clearly that of Jac16888, as was stated clearly we are in the process of editing this article. After determining Jac16888's identity, I am now aware that this is an issue of a personal nature. We will be handling this in a different manner now. JohanPienaar (talk) 18:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Well, clearly you've found me out: I'm actually a competitor of Mr. Goosen, a rivalry spreading back over 20 years in fact, and for the last 5 years I have been plotting and preparing for this moment. Or perhaps a more likely situtation is that I have absolutely zero connection to the aforementioned, having never heard of him before this moment, that I geniunely do not believe the content I have removed is appropriate and that any "identity" you may have found is probably about as genuine as my little story. And beyond that you may want to read WP:OUTING,WP:LEGAL and perhaps Paranoia--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

A so your knowledge of what might be fluff is purely made up in your own mind. But I will follow the dispute resolution procedures. And no I will not be using your specific little gang of editors. JohanPienaar (talk) 18:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Please go ahead. And for the record I have to the best of my knowledge never had any interaction with either of the editors who have engaged themselves in this dispute so you can lose that little theory of yours--Jac16888 ^Talk 18:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)